Glacier Bancorp (GBCI)
NYSEFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-09-04
$46.83+1.01%
Close 2026-09-04 · 1-day change
NYSEFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-09-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · GBCI
Price, fair value, and the multiples that frame it on the same time axis. Scroll over the price chart to zoom.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-06. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $47 GBCI trades at 1.4× p/b, in line with its 1.2× p/b peer median — but our blended $36 fair value sits below the price. It's a high-confidence read. The flat-multiple read looks rich, but earnings are inflecting up — trailing growth is accelerating and forward estimates confirm — so we've softened our read rather than brand an accelerating name expensive. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
Score 100 = cheapest in the cohort, 0 = richest. Bars are filled left-to-right based on the peer-relative score (or PEG/self-history where shown).
Each method's implied share price per horizon. Provisional rows use a projected (historical-CAGR) growth input rather than analyst or management guidance.
| Method | Horizon | Est. price | Multiple | Per-share input | EPS source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer P/B | 12M | $41.04 | 1.2 | 33.09 | TTM | medium |
| Peer P/FCF | 12M | $35.49 | 11.7 | 3.04 | TTM | medium |
| Peer P/E | 12M | $37.33 | 10.9 | 3.42 | ntm analyst | medium |
| Peer P/S | 12M | $24.85 | 3.2 | 7.86 | TTM | medium |
| PEG | 12M |
A “consensus-then vs. actual-now” overlay is on the way — what our valuation estimate said on a past date versus where the price actually landed.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
| $74.52 |
| 28.3 |
| 2.63 |
| TTM |
| medium |
| triangulated | 12M | $32.26 | 11.9 | 2.70 | Triangulated | medium |
| Peer P/B | 3Y | $60.47 | 1.2 | 48.76 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/FCF | 3Y | $31.78 | 11.7 | 2.72 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/E | 3Y | $264.67 | 10.9 | 24.28 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/S | 3Y | $43.71 | 3.2 | 13.83 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/B | 5Y | $78.31 | 1.2 | 63.14 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/FCF | 5Y | $29.52 | 11.7 | 2.53 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/E | 5Y | $350.02 | 10.9 | 32.11 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/S | 5Y | $57.81 | 3.2 | 18.29 | Analyst | medium |