Reading AA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AA free→Reading AA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AA free→
NYSEMaterialsAluminumSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits are not well supported by cash. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is elevated and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 13% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. If AA cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $68.77. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $69 AA trades at 23× p/e, in line with its 20× p/e peer median. Our $61 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $68–$80. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 13% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about -8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1093).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.90x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Materials names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=988).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.22 → $2.34 (+5.8% / 30d). 2 raised, 0 cut, 8 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 20.6% above current price.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$211.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$536.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,177.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Company momentum rose by 18.8 points (from -17.1 to 1.7).
Confidence changed from 'medium' to 'high'.
Company momentum rose. Confidence changed to high.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show Alcoa's financial health and market position.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows improved metrics across revenue and cash flow.
Confirms the other:Earnings report reveals further declines in revenue and cash flow.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Threatens: Focus on cash flow improvement
CFO's warning indicates significant cash flow risks.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 4, 2026, Alcoa Corporation (the “Company”), Alcoa Nederland Holding B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Borrower”), and certain subsidiaries of the Company, entered into Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”) to the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2016, as amended as of October 26, 2016, as amended and restated as of November 14, 2017, as amended and restated as of November 21, 2018, as amended as of August…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$68.00 – $80.00 (median $75.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-06-11
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Materials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | full | elevated |
RS Reliance, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
RGLD Royal Gold | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | full | moderate |
RPM RPM International | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | fair | moderate |
SOLS Solstice Advanced Materials | — | expensive | moderate |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Materials names rated neutral grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=272).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Alcoa aims to enhance its cash flow through operational efficiencies and cost management.
Alcoa is committed to enhancing operational efficiency to improve profitability.
Alcoa is focused on driving revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: Positive cash flow shows Alcoa is managing its finances well. This is crucial for stability.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations remains above $75M in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations drops back below $75M.
Why it matters: Improving cash flow is a top priority for Alcoa. It signals better financial health.
Confirms:Cash flow shows a positive trend in the next quarterly report.
Disproves:Cash flow remains negative or worsens in the next quarterly report.
Why it matters: The materials sector is declining. Signs of revenue growth could indicate a sector recovery.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth turns positive after a period of decline.
Disproves:Sector revenue keeps falling, showing ongoing problems.
Why it matters: Better revenue growth shows more market demand. This is important for Alcoa's recovery.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth shows an increase from Q1's $3.193B.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth continues to decline or stays below $3.193B.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under “
The information contained in this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, shall be deemed “furnished” and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing made under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in suc…
The filing describes amendments to the company's compensation plan, not a management change.