Reading ACA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACA free→Reading ACA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACA free→NYSEIndustrialsEngineering & ConstructionSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 15% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. The company is not currently profitable, so the valuation leans on sales- and cash-based methods. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $129.51. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $130 ACA trades at 27× p/e, below its 34× p/e peer median. Our $154 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 16% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 13%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.86x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=4440).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.27 → $1.18 (-7.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 2 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$145.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$261.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,145.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better margins mean the company controls costs well and works efficiently.
Confirms:Adjusted EBITDA margin for Q2 is over 18.0%.
Disproves:Adjusted EBITDA margin for Q2 falls below 17.0%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ACA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operation and Financial Condition. Attached as Exhibit 99.1 is the registrant’s earnings release for the first quarter of 2026, issued April 30, 2026. This release is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise incorporated by reference into any filing pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as otherwise expressly…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Construction & Engineering.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ACA Arcosa, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | fair | moderate |
PWR Quanta Services | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
FIX Comfort Systems USA | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
EME Emcor | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | moderate |
MTZ MasTec | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Arcosa aims to concentrate on its core growth platforms in Construction Products and Engineered Structures following the barge business divestiture.
Arcosa has increased its full-year 2026 guidance for revenues and Adjusted EBITDA based on strong performance in utility structures.
Arcosa aims to enhance financial flexibility by using proceeds from the barge sale to reduce debt and invest in core growth platforms.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Continue efforts to enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend shows good use of money. It shows strength during tough times.
Confirms:Dividend payments confirmed at $0.05 per share for the next quarter.
Disproves:Dividend payments cut below $0.05 per share.
Why it matters: This growth would show Arcosa is making progress in its revenue growth strategy. It would signal that the company is overcoming sector headwinds.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 8% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Less debt makes the company more stable and flexible for future investments.
Confirms:Company reports a decrease in net debt to Adjusted EBITDA below 2.0x.
Disproves:Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA remains above 2.3x.
Why it matters: A bigger backlog means strong future demand. This helps with revenue growth.
Confirms:Utility structures backlog grows more than 20% from Q1.
Disproves:Utility structures backlog grows less than 10% from Q1.
Why it matters: This shows that Arcosa is managing costs well. It helps improve operating income.
Confirms:Operating income grew over 10% compared to last year.
Disproves:Operating income grew less than 5% compared to last year.