Reading ALGM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ALGM free→Reading ALGM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ALGM free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been steady. The company was unprofitable over the past year, so its earnings quality can't be assessed. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind, which may support growth. Peer multiples imply a price about 98% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $50.41. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $50 ALGM trades at 12× p/s, in line with its 12× p/s peer median. Our $25 fair value reflects that, low confidence. Analysts: $45–$62. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 98% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.85x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.20 → $0.21 (+4.4% / 30d). 5 raised, 1 cut, 10 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$263.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$528.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,922.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better efficiency can lead to higher profits. It shows Allegro is using resources well.
Confirms:Operating income improves to at least $20M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income remains below $10M in Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ALGM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter and fiscal year ended March 27, 2026. The full text of the press release issued is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$45.00 – $62.00 (median $52.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-05-08
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ALGM Allegro MicroSystems | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 40 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing gross profit margin through operational efficiencies.
Drive revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Focus on improving operational efficiency to support profitability.
Why it matters: Allegro MicroSystems wants to grow revenue. This shows there is demand in the market.
Confirms:Revenue growth exceeds 10% year over year in the Q2 earnings report.
Disproves:Revenue growth falls below 5% year over year in the Q2 earnings report.
Why it matters: Changes in leadership can shift company strategy. This may affect future performance.
Confirms one read:New directors have new strategies that support growth.
Confirms the other:The new directors have not announced any new plans.
Why it matters: Improving gross profit margin is a key management goal. It shows better cost control.
Confirms:Gross profit margin increases year over year in the Q2 earnings report.
Disproves:Gross profit margin declines year over year in the Q2 earnings report.
Why it matters: A drop below median revenue growth in the sector could signal broader challenges.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median in upcoming reports.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median in upcoming reports.
Director — Susan D. Lynch, Richard R. Lury: Directors are retiring and a new director is being elected.