Reading AZTA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AZTA free→Reading AZTA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track AZTA free→
NASDAQHealth CareMedical Instruments & SuppliesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed as the company was unprofitable over the past year. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with performance compared to sector peers being below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment hinges on whether AZTA cuts guidance on the next call, which could negatively impact estimates. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $22.59. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $23 the market pays 50× p/e — above the 27× p/e peer median but in line with its own 57× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $22 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 5% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about -7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated weak grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=2391).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.36x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.23 → $0.10 (-56.9% / 30d). 0 raised, 4 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$238.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$512.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,094.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Signal changed from 'mixed' to 'cautious'.
Valuation label changed from 'fair' to 'full'.
As of June 12, 2026, the signal label changed to "cautious," indicating a shift in outlook. The valuation label also changed to "full," suggesting a different assessment of the stock's value. These changes reflect adjustments in market perception and valuation context.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A bigger loss in operating income shows management is having a hard time making more money. This might hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Operating income reported worse than -$165.8M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income improves or stays better than -$165.8M.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for AZTA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. Except for historical information con…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Life Sciences Tools & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
AZTA Azenta, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 16 of 100 | full | elevated |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | fair | moderate |
DHR Danaher Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | fair | moderate |
A Agilent Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | fair | moderate |
WAT Waters Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on strengthening commercial execution, optimizing operating footprint, and improving productivity in Multiomics.
Strengthen execution and reinforce operational discipline to improve business visibility.
Extend the timeline of long-range plan targets from 2028 to 2029 due to revised 2026 outlook.
Focus on improving operating income despite current negative figures.
Management aims to increase revenue through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: If revenue growth slows, it signals potential issues in demand or execution. This could hurt future growth prospects.
Confirms:Revenue reported below $144.8M in Q2.
Disproves:Revenue growth exceeds $144.8M in Q2.
Why it matters: A slowdown in sector growth could impact Azenta's performance. It may signal broader market challenges.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: If guidance stays the same or gets better, it means demand is rising. It also shows that execution is improving.
Confirms:Q3 organic revenue guidance is flat or shows positive growth compared to FY'25.
Disproves:Q3 organic revenue guidance remains negative or worsens from the current -2% to +1% range.
Why it matters: A drop in gross profit shows margins are getting worse. This could mean bigger problems in operations.
Confirms:Gross profit reported below $62.0M in Q2.
Disproves:Gross profit improves or stays above $62.0M.