Reading CDP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CDP free→Reading CDP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CDP free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - OfficeSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, CDP is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 9% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $34.54. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $35 the market pays 25× p/e — above the 15× p/e peer median but in line with its own 22× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $38 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Analysts: $33–$38. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 10% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1968).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.05x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=1866).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, the US dollar.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.32 → $0.32 (+0.0% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 63% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 3.4% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$70.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$148.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,072.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Important economic reports could change market conditions and how investors feel. This could impact COPT's performance.
Confirms one read:Consumer Price Index shows inflation is going down, which boosts market confidence.
Confirms the other:The Producer Price Index shows inflation is going up. This raises worries in the market.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CDP yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 27, 2026, COPT Defense Properties (the “Company”) issued a press release relating to its financial results for the period ended March 31, 2026 and, in connection with this release, is making available certain supplemental information pertaining to its properties and operations. The earnings release and supplemental information are included as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and are incorporated herein by reference. The information included he…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$33.00 – $38.00 (median $34.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-06-08
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Office REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CDP COPT Defense Properties | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | fair | moderate |
BXP BXP, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | full | moderate |
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 44 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Continue efforts to enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Aim to increase net income through revenue growth and cost efficiency.
Why it matters: Better operating income would show that cost management is working. This could increase overall profits.
Confirms:Operating income increases by more than 5% in Q2 results.
Disproves:Operating income declines or stays flat in Q2 results.
Why it matters: Faster revenue growth would show the company is handling challenges well. This could help investors feel more confident.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported at 7% or higher year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Exceeding this growth rate would show that management's focus on revenue is working.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported at over 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: A sector rebound could benefit CDP and support its growth strategy.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth reported above 5% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth reported below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: Growth in net income would support the company's goal of increasing profitability. This could attract more investors.
Confirms:Net income grows by more than 5% in Q2 results.
Disproves:Net income declines or stays flat in Q2 results.