Reading CENT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CENT free→Reading CENT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CENT free→NASDAQConsumer StaplesPackaged FoodsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact CENT's performance compared to its peers, where it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. The outlook hinges on guidance changes, as a cut could negatively affect estimates and the stock. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $42.85. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $43 CENT trades at 15× p/e, below its 17× p/e peer median. Our $49 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 12% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=1526).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.91x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1382).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.59 → $1.52 (-4.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 3 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 80% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$102.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$273.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,944.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how the company is doing. This is important because of sector challenges.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share is better than what analysts expected. This shows strong performance.
Confirms the other:Earnings per share is lower than analyst expectations. This shows weak performance.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CENT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
No material events in the last 90 days.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Household Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CENT Central Garden & Pet Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 60 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CL Colgate-Palmolive | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | full | moderate |
KMB Kimberly-Clark | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CHD Church & Dwight | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | expensive | low |
CLX Clorox | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 69 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
Why it matters: CPI data can impact consumer spending and inflation. Changes may affect Central's pricing strategy and margins.
Confirms one read:CPI data shows inflation below 3% year over year.
Confirms the other:CPI data shows inflation above 4% year over year.
Why it matters: A rebound in revenue growth would signal a positive change in the sector's trend.
Confirms:Revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year, indicating a return to growth.
Disproves:Revenue growth is below 5% year over year. This shows a slowdown.
Why it matters: This report gives insight into consumer spending trends. Strong retail sales can boost Central's sales outlook.
Confirms one read:Retail sales growth reported above 4% year over year.
Confirms the other:Retail sales growth reported below 2% year over year.
Why it matters: Faster revenue growth shows Central is doing better. It may mean the company is beating challenges in its sector.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Changes in unemployment claims can impact consumer spending. This can also affect company sales.
Confirms one read:Unemployment claims are down. This suggests a stronger job market and more spending.
Confirms the other:Unemployment claims are up. This shows a weaker job market and less spending.