Coda Octopus Group Inc (CODA)
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-09-04
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-09-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · CODA
How strong the business is — where it ranks within its sector on capital efficiency and cash generation, and how well management has been executing.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management focuses on growing revenue and increasing operating income as key financial performance metrics.
Stated as a priority in 8 of last 8 quarters. Revenue increased from $5.05B in 2024-Q4 to $6.90B in 2026-Q2, while operating income rose from $288M to $1.79B. The trajectory shows consistent growth and improving profitability, indicating management is delivering on this priority.
“Revenue increased to $6.90B with operating income at $1.79B.”
“Revenue was $6.71B and operating income $1.01B.”
“Revenue reached $7.27B with operating income of $1.41B.”
“Revenue at $7.06B and operating income $1.38B.”
“Revenue was $7.02B with operating income $1.09B.”
“Revenue at $5.21B and operating income $662M.”
“Revenue was $5.05B and operating income $288M.”
“Revenue at $5.48B with operating income $1.39B.”
Management emphasizes sustaining positive cash flow from operating activities to support financial health.
Stated in 6 of last 6 quarters. Cash from operations remained positive, ranging from $570M in 2026-Q2 to $2.20B in 2025-Q3. The trajectory shows sustained positive cash flow, consistent with management's stated priority.
“Cash from operating activities was $570M.”
“Operating cash flow totaled $1.48B.”
“Cash from operations was $2.20B.”
“Operating cash flow was $1.46B.”
“Cash from operations totaled $641M.”
“Operating cash flow was $1.71B.”
Successfully transition financial leadership following CFO retirement and new appointment to maintain operational stability.
Newly stated in 2026-Q2 with the CFO transition announcement. This leadership change is recent, so financial impact is not yet measurable. Management has communicated the transition to maintain stability.
“CFO Gayle Jardine retiring; Mark Kelly appointed new CFO.”
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=6958).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.32x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=6654).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity (low R² over the window).
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Industrials names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2546).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-09-04.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.