Reading CRI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRI free→Reading CRI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CRI free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryApparel RetailSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality and management's track record are neutral. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 24% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. Watching for guidance changes from CRI and sector bellwethers like TJX, ROST, and BURL will be important for future direction. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $42.79. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $43 CRI trades at 13× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $56 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $33–$41. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 24% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated strong grew net income 70% of the time over the next year (vs 53% for the rest of the cohort, n=2844).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.96x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=3229).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.15 → $0.06 (+141.0% / 30d). 6 raised, 0 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 29% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$179.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$429.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,030.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The new CEO's approach may change company priorities and performance outlook.
Confirms one read:The new CEO announces a clear strategy that aligns with revenue growth.
Confirms the other:The new CEO does not share a clear plan, which creates uncertainty.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CRI yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Executive Officer and President — Sharon Price John: The company appointed a new CEO and President from an external source.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$33.00 – $41.00 (median $39.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-11
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CRI Carter's, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 51 of 100 | fair | elevated |
NKE Nike, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | full | moderate |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | full | moderate |
LULU Lululemon Athletica | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=646).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving low single-digit to mid-single-digit percentage growth in net sales.
Plan for low single-digit to mid-single-digit growth in adjusted operating income.
Continue to declare quarterly dividends based on business conditions and financial performance.
Why it matters: Improving sector growth could boost Carter's revenue. This is important for overall performance.
Confirms:Consumer sector revenue growth rises above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Consumer sector revenue growth remains below 2% year over year.
Why it matters: Growth above this level shows good cost control and efficient operations.
Confirms:Operating income growth is above 10% compared to last year.
Disproves:Operating income growth is below 10% compared to last year.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it shows weak demand in a tough market.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains above 5% year over year.
Why it matters: Changes in the dividend policy can affect how investors feel. It can also change how money is spent.
Confirms one read:The company will raise the cash dividend paid every quarter.
Confirms the other:Company cuts or suspends the quarterly cash dividend.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if revenue growth is improving. This is key for future plans.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth above 4% year over year.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth below 2% year over year.
Why it matters: This level shows the company cares about its shareholders. This is true even with lower payouts.
Confirms:The company declares a dividend of $0.25 per share in the next quarter.
Disproves:The company cuts the dividend payment to less than $0.25 per share.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 6, 2026, Carter’s, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for its fiscal quarter ended April 4, 2026. A copy of that press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in the Current Report on Form 8-K is being furnished and shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Sec…
Regulation FD Disclosure. On May 14, 2026, the Company announced, in a press release, the declaration of a quarterly cash dividend to the Company’s stockholders. A copy of the Company’s press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in
and Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed by the Company pursuant to the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific ref…