CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS)
NASDAQIndustrialsSoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-09-04
NASDAQIndustrialsSoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-09-04
Research Workspace
Put CSGS beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Primary pillar broken — EPS at or above $5.11 for FY 2026: FY26 EPS guide $1.37 vs $5.11 target.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 3% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens strong on capital allocation, margins, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementModerate volatility — typically moves about 0% a day.
View RiskCSGS's growth depends on maintaining strong earnings, particularly with EPS guidance at $1.37 for FY 2026. Revenue grew 4.8% year over year, and the last quarter beat expectations. It trades at a premium compared to peers, with no priced-in row available. The miss probability for the next quarter is 19%. The primary risk is the broken pillar of EPS guidance, which is significantly below the target of $5.11 for FY 2026. Peer multiples imply a price about 19% below where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-05-14. CSGS is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 7 analysts currently covering CSGS (as of May 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare CSGS with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Data Processing & Outsourced Services — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put CSGS next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-05-14. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.