Reading CVI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CVI free→Reading CVI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CVI free→
NYSEEnergyOil & Gas Refining & MarketingSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and the company was unprofitable over the past year, so its earnings quality can't be assessed. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with CVI trading below typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 66% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak or earnings quality is fragile. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and sector trends from major players like VLO, MPC, and PSX. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $30.67. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $31 CVI trades at 0× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $86 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 64% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Energy names rated weak grew net income 60% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=979).
Over the trailing year it converted -9.60x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.66 → $0.96 (+46.4% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 0% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 10.5% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$233.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$556.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,821.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show how well CVR Energy is managing costs and revenues.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) exceeds $0.50.
Confirms the other:EPS falls below $0.20.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CVI yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, CVR Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing information regarding its results of operations and financial condition for the three months ended March 31, 2026, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in Items 2.02 and 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K (“Current Report”) and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is being “furnished” and shall not be dee…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
VLO Valero Energy | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | full | moderate |
MPC Marathon Petroleum | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | moderate |
PSX Phillips 66 | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | full | moderate |
DINO HF Sinclair | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Ensure capital expenditures remain within the set guidance range for fiscal year 2026.
Focus on managing and controlling direct operating expenses within the specified guidance range.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims may show a weak economy. This could hurt CVR Energy's sales and prices.
Confirms:Unemployment claims rise a lot compared to last week.
Disproves:Unemployment claims go down or stay the same.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if CVR Energy can improve its financial condition. Investors will look for signs of recovery.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings show a profit or a smaller loss compared to Q1 results.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings report shows a larger loss than in Q1.
Why it matters: Higher operating expenses can hurt profits. Keeping them controlled is key for financial health.
Confirms:Direct operating expenses go up more than 5% from last quarter.
Disproves:Direct operating expenses stay the same or go down from last quarter.
Why it matters: Keeping CAPEX within the guidance range shows financial discipline. It can improve investor confidence.
Confirms:CAPEX reported in the next quarter stays within the guided range.
Disproves:CAPEX exceeds the upper limit of the guidance range.
Why it matters: If revenue growth improves, it shows the energy sector is gaining momentum. This can benefit CVR Energy.
Confirms:Energy sector revenue growth exceeds 6% year over year.
Disproves:Energy sector revenue growth falls below 3% year over year.