NYSEFinancialsInformation Technology ServicesSnapshot 2026-07-07
Reading FIS? This analysis is rebuilt every market day. Get it tracked free. No credit card.
Track FIS free→QuarterlyIQ Insights · FIS
Price, fair value, and the multiples that frame it on the same time axis. Scroll over the price chart to zoom.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots inline.
A consensus fair price across 14 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $42.59. As of 2026-07-08. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $43 FIS trades at 7.2× p/e, below its 17× p/e peer median. Our $68 fair value sits well above the price. We hold it with medium confidence: the peer anchor overstates how cheap it looks and quality doesn't explain valuation multiples in this sub-industry, so the peer comparison is a weak guide. Analysts target $45–$70. Not investment advice.
$45.00 – $70.00 (median $57.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-07-07
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
Score 100 = cheapest in the cohort, 0 = richest. Bars are filled left-to-right based on the peer-relative score (or PEG/self-history where shown).
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Each method's implied share price per horizon. Provisional rows use a projected (historical-CAGR) growth input rather than analyst or management guidance.
| Method | Horizon | Est. price | Multiple | Per-share input | EPS source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyst target | 12M | $53.50 | — | — | Analyst | high |
| dcf fcfe | 12M | $92.71 | — | — | Hist. CAGR | high |
| dcf fcff | 12M | $98.17 | — | — | Hist. CAGR | high |
| ddm gordon | 12M | $25.64 | — | — | TTM | high |
| graham number | 12M | $64.11 | — | — | TTM | high |
| Mgmt guidance | 12M | $103.76 | 16.5 | 6.27 | Mgmt | high |
| Peer P/B | 12M | $64.85 | 2.1 | 30.91 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/FCF | 12M | $73.18 | 13.6 | 5.38 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/E | 12M | $97.80 | 16.5 | 5.91 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/S | 12M | $74.67 | 3.4 | 22.13 | TTM | high |
| PEG | 12M | $118.68 | 20.1 | 5.91 | TTM | high |
| residual income | 12M | $42.77 | — | — | TTM | high |
| Own P/E history | 12M | $50.57 | 8.6 | 5.91 | TTM | high |
| triangulated | 12M | $103.85 | 16.5 | 6.28 | Triangulated | high |
| Mgmt guidance | 3Y | $139.85 | 16.5 | 8.45 | Mgmt(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/B | 3Y | $38.23 | 2.1 | 18.22 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/FCF | 3Y | $84.17 | 13.6 | 6.19 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/E | 3Y | $131.82 | 16.5 | 7.97 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/S | 3Y | $117.61 | 3.4 | 34.85 | guidance | medium |
| PEG | 3Y | $159.97 | 20.1 | 7.97 | Analyst | medium |
| Own P/E history | 3Y | $68.16 | 8.6 | 7.97 | Analyst | medium |
| Mgmt guidance | 5Y | $170.65 | 16.5 | 10.31 | Mgmt(prov.) | high |
| Peer P/B | 5Y | $26.88 | 2.1 | 12.81 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | high |
| Peer P/FCF | 5Y | $92.39 | 13.6 | 6.79 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | high |
| Peer P/E | 5Y | $160.86 | 16.5 | 9.72 | Analyst | high |
| Peer P/S | 5Y | $155.54 | 3.4 | 46.09 | guidance | high |
| PEG | 5Y | $195.20 | 20.1 | 9.72 | Analyst | high |
| Own P/E history | 5Y | $83.17 | 8.6 | 9.72 | Analyst | high |
A “consensus-then vs. actual-now” overlay is on the way — what our valuation estimate said on a past date versus where the price actually landed.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
