Reading FTDR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTDR free→Reading FTDR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FTDR free→NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryPersonal ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral, indicating some variability in cash backing reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair. If FTDR cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $68.83. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $69 FTDR trades at 17× p/e, in line with its 16× p/e peer median. Our $67 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 3% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.59x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=3229).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.77 → $1.76 (-0.8% / 30d). 1 raised, 4 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 57% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$166.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$305.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,923.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'fair' to 'full'.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation changed, moving from fair to full. This indicates a shift in how the stock is valued relative to its peers. The overall risk remains moderate, while the sector backdrop is noted as a headwind. The inputs suggest that the financial outlook is provisional, with potential changes in guidance and sector trends that could impact future performance.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This will show if Frontdoor is on track to increase revenue growth. A strong result could boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 4% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 0% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FTDR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the text of the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific re…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Specialized Consumer Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FTDR Frontdoor, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | full | moderate |
DASH DoorDash | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 61 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SCI Service Corp Intl | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 54 of 100 | full | moderate |
ADT ADT Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 92 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
HRB H&R Block | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Improve operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Focus on increasing cash flow from operations to support growth.
Why it matters: Consumer spending affects Frontdoor's revenue. Changes in retail sales can signal shifts in demand.
Confirms one read:Retail sales increase by more than 1% month over month.
Confirms the other:Retail sales decrease by more than 1% month over month.
Why it matters: More cash from operations means Frontdoor can invest in growth. This is key for future success.
Confirms:Cash from operations increases by more than 10% compared to Q1.
Disproves:Cash from operations decreases or stays flat compared to Q1.
Why it matters: Improving operating income shows Frontdoor is managing costs well. This could lead to better overall performance.
Confirms:Operating income goes up by more than 5% from Q1.
Disproves:Operating income goes down or stays the same from Q1.