Reading GLPI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GLPI free→Reading GLPI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GLPI free→
NASDAQReal EstateReit - SpecialtySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is low, but the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect performance compared to peers, where GLPI trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 19% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact, priced roughly in line with peers, with steady recent financials and earnings quality. Key factors to watch include any changes in guidance and the performance of sector bellwethers. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $47.47. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $47 GLPI trades at 15× p/e, in line with its 15× p/e peer median. Our $40 fair value reflects that, medium confidence. Analysts: $48–$53. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 19% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated strong grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1506).
Over the trailing year it converted 17.21x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated robust grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=1399).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.79 → $0.80 (+0.5% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$69.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$180.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,238.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A higher dividend shows the company is committed to returning value to shareholders. It signals financial strength.
Confirms:A press release or announcement confirming an increase in dividend per share beyond $0.78.
Disproves:No increase in dividend per share or a decrease from the current $0.78.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GLPI yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished pursuant to
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$48.50 – $53.00 (median $52.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-12
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Other Specialized REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GLPI Gaming and Leisure Properties | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | full | low |
IRM Iron Mountain | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 31 of 100 | full | moderate |
LAMR Lamar Advertising Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | low |
OUT Outfront Media | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | fair | moderate |
EPR EPR Properties | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | full | moderate |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Continue to increase the dividend per share as part of capital allocation strategy.
Focus on increasing operating income through operational efficiencies.
Enhance cash flow from operating activities to support financial stability.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if the company is making more money and generating cash.
Confirms:Q2 earnings report shows operating income growing year over year by more than 5%.
Disproves:Operating income declines year over year or stays flat.
Why it matters: Faster revenue growth shows a positive change in the sector's maturity.
Confirms one read:Revenue growth speeds up to over 10% year over year.
Confirms the other:Revenue growth remains below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: A dividend increase shows trust in cash flow and profits.
Confirms:Management announces a dividend increase of at least 5% per share.
Disproves:No dividend increase is announced during the next earnings call.
Why it matters: More cash flow can lead to higher dividends. It also helps keep operations steady.
Confirms:Cash from operations grows by more than 10% each year.
Disproves:Cash from operating activities declines or grows less than 5% year over year.