Reading GSHD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GSHD free→Reading GSHD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GSHD free→
NASDAQFinancialsInsurance BrokersSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, while risk is elevated and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 32% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts and the performance of sector bellwethers. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $36.82. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $37 the market pays 20× p/e — above the 13× p/e peer median but in line with its own 62× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $39 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $52–$90. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 6% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.26x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.52 → $0.51 (-0.5% / 30d). 4 raised, 6 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 46% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 54.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$288.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$651.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,825.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Confidence changed from 'high' to 'medium'.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation changed, moving from fair to full. Risk rose, indicating a heightened level of uncertainty. The sector backdrop remained a headwind, suggesting ongoing challenges in the market environment. The company’s earnings quality is described as robust, reflecting strong financial performance.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If growth falls below 12%, it may signal weakening demand for insurance products.
Confirms:Total written premiums growth reported below 12% year over year.
Disproves:Total written premiums growth remains at or above 12% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GSHD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) — Mark Jones, Jr.: Mark Jones, Jr. was promoted to President and COO.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$52.00 – $90.00 (median $67.00) · 12 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2024-Q3, 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Insurance Brokers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GSHD Goosehead Insurance, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | fair | elevated |
MRSH Marsh McLennan | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | full | moderate |
AON Aon plc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | full | moderate |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
WTW Willis Towers Watson | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving organic revenue growth between 10% and 19% for 2026.
Continue efforts to improve operating income through strategic initiatives.
Focus on improving cash flow from operations to support business growth.
Why it matters: A drop in margin may mean costs are going up or operations are not efficient.
Confirms:The adjusted EBITDA margin is less than 25%.
Disproves:Adjusted EBITDA margin stays at or above 25%.
Why it matters: John Martin's plans may change financial strategy and operations. This is important after his new role.
Confirms one read:A press release shares new plans from the CFO.
Confirms the other:No updates or changes in strategy will be announced in the next quarter.
Why it matters: If it drops below 10%, it may show trouble keeping clients and getting new ones.
Confirms:Core revenue growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Core revenue growth remains at or above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: More cash flow helps growth plans and shows financial strength. It matches management's goals.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported above $25M.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations reported below $22M.
99.2 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. dated April 22, 2026 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (Formatted as Inline XBRL) Date: April 22, 2026 EXHIBIT INDEX No. Description 99.1 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. on April 22, 2026 99.2 Press Release issued by Goosehead Insurance, Inc. on April 22, 2026 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the und…