Chart Industries (GTLS)
NYSEIndustrialsIndustrial - MachinerySnapshot 2026-09-04
NYSEIndustrialsIndustrial - MachinerySnapshot 2026-09-04
Research Workspace
Put GTLS beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Primary pillar broken — Cash flow from operations improves toward positive territory: FY25 OCF +$292.7M vs 0; TTM OCF -$248.0M.
View ThesisRevenue is contracting — down about 2% over the past year.
View GrowthRanks in the weakest quality tier of its industry — roughly the bottom 34%, softest on share dilution.
View QualityManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, margins.
View ManagementExpectations look high — the market is pricing in about 22% growth a year, above the roughly 4% analysts expect, leaving little room for error.
View ValuationModerate volatility — typically moves about 0% a day.
View RiskGTLS must improve cash flow from operations to justify its current valuation. The latest financial performance shows a steady trend, but cash flow remains negative at -248 million. It trades at a valuation that is below typical for its sector peers. This suggests that the market may not fully reflect the risks associated with its fragile earnings quality. A specific risk is the 33% probability of missing outlook in the next quarter. Peer multiples imply a price about 33% below where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-07-16. GTLS is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 7 analysts currently covering GTLS (as of Jul 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare GTLS with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put GTLS next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Improve operating income
Earnings miss impacts operating income objective.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-07-16. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.