Reading GWRE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GWRE free→Reading GWRE? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GWRE free→
NYSEInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but risk is elevated. Earnings quality is neutral, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind, with GWRE compared to sector peers being above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 83% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, particularly how major players like SAP and CRM perform. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $122.56. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $123 the market pays 38× p/e — above the 21× p/e peer median but in line with its own 112× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $67 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $175–$250. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 82% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 20%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.19x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.95 → $0.94 (-1.3% / 30d). 11 raised, 3 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 10 maintained. 88% of analysts rate Buy.
7 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 42.8% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$238.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$522.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,548.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A raised revenue outlook would show strong business growth and investor confidence.
Confirms:Management says they expect more revenue this fiscal year during an earnings call.
Disproves:Management keeps or lowers their revenue outlook for the fiscal year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GWRE yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of the general incorporation language of such filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$175.00 – $250.00 (median $218.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-06-08
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GWRE Guidewire Software | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Guidewire has raised its fiscal year revenue outlook based on better than expected Q3 results.
Guidewire has raised its fiscal year operating income guidance due to improved Q3 performance.
Guidewire has improved its cash flow visibility, raising fiscal year cash flow guidance.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth may show wider market issues for Guidewire.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median for the first time in a year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.