SOLANA CO (HSDT)
NASDAQFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-11-04
$2.10+1.94%
Close 2026-11-04 · 1-day change
NASDAQFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-11-04
Research Workspace
Put HSDT beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Asset Management & Custody Banks is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — Operating income improves toward break-even: Comparison needs review.
View ThesisManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, margins, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 3% on a typical day and fell roughly 77% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskHSDT trades at 14x sales versus a 3x peer median. The company remains unprofitable with weak recent performance. The latest quarter missed consensus estimates significantly. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 40%. The primary pillar is under pressure, but the comparison is unverified. The thesis comparison is not yet verified. Peer multiples imply a price about 13% above where it trades. The thesis is on watch, and this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-11-04. HSDT is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 2 analysts currently covering HSDT (as of Nov 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare HSDT with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSDT Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-11-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Asset Management & Custody Banks — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put HSDT next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Expand institutional-grade validator infrastructure
JPMorgan tokenized funds on Solana support institutional use, but the headline does not establish meaningful adoption or revenue.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-11-04. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Advances: Disciplined capital allocation including share repurchases
Funds support disciplined capital allocation strategy.
Advances: Expand institutional-grade validator infrastructure
Enhances institutional-grade validator infrastructure through stablecoin integration.
Advances: Expand institutional-grade validator infrastructure
SEC clearance boosts institutional validator infrastructure expansion.
Threatens: Improve operating income
Q2 loss impacts growth and revenue objectives.
Advances: Grow revenue through staking and advisory services
Surge in staking revenue supports revenue growth objective.
Advances: Expand institutional-grade validator infrastructure
Validator rewards enhance infrastructure growth plans.
Threatens: Enhance revenue growth
Revenue miss impacts growth objective.
