Investors Title Co. (ITIC)
NASDAQFinancialsInsurance - SpecialtySnapshot 2026-11-04
NASDAQFinancialsInsurance - SpecialtySnapshot 2026-11-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · ITIC
What must go right, what could break, what the price assumes, and what evidence comes next.
The current health of the standing investment case.
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
One-year growth currently built into the price, compared with our model's estimate.
| Measure | Marker shape | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Growth built into the price | circle | -20.4% |
| Our one-year growth estimate | diamond |
For each item: what to watch, what would become a concern, and what would make it less concerning.
A reporting-risk estimate, not a forecast of the stock-price response.
Historical relationships that met the evidence threshold. They do not prove cause or forecast a move.
No outside relationship met the current evidence threshold.
Based on historical daily prices through 2026-11-04.
Past price behavior in dollars on a $10,000 position. This does not measure permanent business risk.
How much price usually moves either way.
A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days.
Use the underlying financial and sector pages to investigate the cause.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
| 1.7% |
Growth built into the price is above our model estimate.
The price assumes 22.1 percentage points less one-year growth.
The one-year revenue growth assumption on Valuation.
Model as of 2026-11-04 · Compared with 3 industry peers · Company calendar date is not available
Why it matters: Investment gains added $4.8 million to Q2 revenue. A reversal could cut reported income even if title work holds up.
Worry ifQ3 reports a net investment loss or net investment gains below $2.1 million.
Less concerning ifQ3 net investment gains are at least $4.8 million, matching Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Premiums grew in both first-half quarters. A higher Q3 total would show that growth is continuing.
Supportive ifQ3 net premiums written exceed $118.5 million, the total for the first half of 2026.
Worry ifQ3 net premiums written fall below $100.8 million, the first-half 2025 total.
Why it matters: The Q2 claims provision rose as premiums grew and loss estimates changed. A lower claims cost rate would ease that concern.
Worry ifThe Q3 claims provision exceeds 4.1% of net premiums written, above Q2's rate.
Less concerning ifThe Q3 claims provision is at or below 4.1% of net premiums written.
We watch for confirming and disproving signals on each item. Resolutions are found automatically where possible and checked by hand for unclear cases. Last 90 days shown.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
| Measure | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Typical day | ±$119 on $10,000 · ±1.2% | How much price usually moves either way. |
| Bad day | $244 loss on $10,000 · 2.4% | A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days. |
| Largest peak-to-trough drop in the past year | $2,476 loss on $10,000 · 24.8% | Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year. |
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement; 1.20 means about 20% more.
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement to the sector. This is secondary context.
Latest 30 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
Latest 252 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
20-trading-day average in US dollars.
Trading days used by the source risk snapshot.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.