Reading JJSF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JJSF free→Reading JJSF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JJSF free→
NASDAQConsumer StaplesPackaged FoodsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly, and risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, JJSF is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 33% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair. If JJSF cuts guidance on the next call, that could have a meaningful negative impact. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $79.57. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $80 the market pays 18× p/e — above the 13× p/e peer median but in line with its own 32× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $60 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 34% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=1526).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.91x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=1037).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the broad stock market, Fed net liquidity.
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Consumer Staples names rated neutral grew net income 50% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=491).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.98 → $1.80 (-9.1% / 30d). 0 raised, 3 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 200.0% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$116.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$287.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,991.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation changed. The valuation label fell from "expensive" to "full." Risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a headwind.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A big drop in net sales shows serious problems in the business change.
Confirms:Q2 net sales reported below $333.6 million, worse than the -3.2% decline.
Disproves:Q2 net sales stabilize or grow year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for JJSF yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On June 5, 2026, J & J Snack Foods Corp. (the “Company”) entered into Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Amendment No. 2”) with Citizens Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and certain lenders and other parties thereto. Amendment No. 2 amends the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2021 (as previously amended), among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers (collecti…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Packaged Foods & Meats.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
JJSF J&J Snack Foods Corp. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 23 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
MDLZ Mondelez International | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
HSY Hershey Company (The) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
KHC Kraft Heinz | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSN Tyson Foods | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLP
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Implement a comprehensive business transformation program to generate $20 million in annualized operating income.
Optimize plant operations to achieve $15 million in annualized pre-tax cost savings.
Continue to focus on execution and innovation with key product launches and customer pilots.
Why it matters: If consumer staples revenue growth picks up, it could benefit J&J Snack Foods.
Confirms:Three-year revenue growth in the sector exceeds 5% again.
Disproves:Three-year revenue growth in the sector remains below 5%.
Why it matters: Good results from Project Apollo are key for making more money and boosting investor trust.
Confirms:Adjusted EBITDA is over $28.7 million. This shows strong gains from Project Apollo.
Disproves:Adjusted EBITDA fails to grow or declines from $28.7 million.
Why it matters: Cost savings from plant changes could help overall profits and aid the transformation.
Confirms:Announcement of at least $15 million in savings from plant changes.
Disproves:No news on cost savings or signs of delays in plant changes.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensation Arrangements of Certain Officers. On June 4, 2026, Michael A. Pollner, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of J & J Snack Foods Corp. (the “Company”), provided a notice of resignation to the Company, effective June 30, 2026. The Company has commenced a search for Mr. Pollner’s successor.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth above under
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS On May 6, 2026, J & J Snack Foods Corp. issued a press release reporting its financial results for the fiscal second quarter ended March 28, 2026. The information in this report and in the attached press release shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by…