Reading KRC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KRC free→Reading KRC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KRC free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - OfficeSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while management's recent track record has been steady. Earnings quality is mixed, and risk is moderate, with the sector backdrop presenting a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 82% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich. The analysis hinges on whether KRC can maintain guidance after recent increases and how macroeconomic factors, like interest rates, may shift. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $38.37. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $38, KRC's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 50× p/e (3.4× the 15× p/e peer median, and 2.1× even its own history). At a normal multiple the price implies ~83% near-term growth vs our ~-2% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $21 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $29–$40. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 83% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated strong grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1506).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.37x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 61% of the time over the next year (vs 47% for the rest of the cohort, n=1866).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.11 → $0.16 (+38.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 0 cut, 3 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 22% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 11.5% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$144.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$269.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,531.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The dividend shows the company is stable. It also cares about its shareholders.
Confirms:The company announces the dividend remains at $0.54 per share.
Disproves:The company cuts the dividend below $0.54 per share.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for KRC yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 27, 2026 , Kilroy Realty Corporation issued a press release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 and distributed certain supplemental financial information. On April 27, 2026 , Kilroy Realty Corporation also posted the supplemental information on its website located at www.kilroyrealty.com . The text of the supplemental information and the related press release are furnished herewith as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, res…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$29.00 – $40.00 (median $38.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Office REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
KRC Kilroy Realty Corp | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BXP BXP, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | full | moderate |
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 44 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Real Estate names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Continue to provide a stable dividend of $0.54 per share to shareholders.
Adjust the Nareit-defined FFO per share guidance for the full year 2026.
Focus on enhancing cash flow from operating activities to support financial stability.
Why it matters: Changes in the Producer Price Index can affect costs and pricing power in real estate.
Confirms one read:PPI shows an increase above 0.3%, indicating rising costs.
Confirms the other:PPI shows a decrease below -0.2%, suggesting falling costs.
Why it matters: A rebound in sector revenue growth could signal a positive shift for Kilroy Realty's performance.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth speeds up again, reaching over 10%.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth keeps slowing down, staying below 5%.
Why it matters: More cash from operations means the company is financially healthy. It shows better efficiency.
Confirms:Cash from operations goes up each year.
Disproves:Cash from operations goes down each year.
Why it matters: New FFO guidance will help us understand the company's growth and finances.
Confirms:Management gives new FFO guidance that is higher than before.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers FFO guidance for 2026.
Why it matters: The unemployment rate impacts demand for real estate. A rising rate could signal weaker demand.
Confirms:The unemployment rate is over 5.5%. This could hurt the real estate market.
Disproves:The unemployment rate is under 4.5%. This shows stronger economic conditions.
The filing pertains to the approval of an amended and restated incentive award plan.