Reading LAUR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LAUR free→Reading LAUR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LAUR free→
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryEducation & Training ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral, indicating some inconsistency in cash backing reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop presents a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 26% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, as these could significantly impact LAUR's performance. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $36.76. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $37 the market pays 22× p/e — above the 16× p/e peer median but in line with its own 20× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $29 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Analysts: $36–$43. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 26% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.32x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=3229).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.98 → $0.97 (-1.7% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 83% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$122.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$311.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,633.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Higher Adjusted EBITDA means better performance and cash flow. This is key for growth.
Confirms:Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2026 is positive or much better than Q1 2026.
Disproves:Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 2026 stays negative or gets worse than Q1 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LAUR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 30, 2026, Laureate Education, Inc. (the “Company”) issued an earnings release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the earnings release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated in this
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$36.50 – $43.00 (median $38.75) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-03-26
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Education Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | full | moderate |
EDU NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION and TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC | — | — | elevated |
DUOL Duolingo | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | fair | elevated |
GHC Graham Holdings | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 72 of 100 | full | moderate |
CVSA Covista Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | fair | high |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=483).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue through enrollment growth and campus expansions.
Enhance operational cash flow through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Enhance operational efficiency through cost management and process improvements.
Why it matters: This report will provide insights into revenue growth and operational efficiency. It is a key event for investors.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth above 11% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue growth below 11% year over year.
Why it matters: Enrollment growth is key to revenue. Meeting this target shows strong demand for Laureate's programs.
Confirms:Total enrollments for Q2 2026 increase by at least 4% compared to Q2 2025.
Disproves:Total enrollments for Q2 2026 grow less than 4% compared to Q2 2025.
Why it matters: If revenue growth falls below median, it signals a potential shift in the growth phase.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below the median growth rate for the sector.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth stays above the median growth rate for the sector.
Approval of a long-term incentive plan at the annual meeting.