Reading LINK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LINK free→Reading LINK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LINK free→NASDAQInformation TechnologyElectronic ComponentsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and the company was unprofitable over the past year, so its earnings quality can't be assessed. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is high, and compared with sector peers, it is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 63% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while recent financials are weak. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, as these could significantly impact LINK's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $4.27. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $4.27 LINK trades at 6× p/s — 1.6× the 4× p/s peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $11 fair value is low-confidence here. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 63% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 26%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.33x of net income into operating cash flow.
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, the broad stock market, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$368.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$980.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,127.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Company momentum rose by 52.8 points (from -32.0 to 20.8).
Composite insight rose by 10.2 points (from -7.8 to 2.4).
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
No named catalysts to watch right now. Check back after the next earnings report.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LINK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus peers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LINK INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Management aims to achieve consistent profitability and scale in the coming year.
Newly stated in 2025-Q3. Despite the aim for consistent profitability, the company reported a net income of -$338,000 in 2026-Q1, showing limited progress towards this goal. Revenue increased from $2,853,000 in 2025-Q4 to $3,074,000 in 2026-Q1, but profitability remains a challenge.
“We believe the coming year will be a transformative period for Interlink as we move toward consistent profitability and scale.”
Management expects approximately $1 million of revenue in 2026 with meaningful expansion projected in 2027 and beyond.
Newly stated in 2025-Q2. Revenue increased from $2,853,000 in 2025-Q4 to $3,074,000 in 2026-Q1, indicating some progress towards the $1 million revenue expectation for 2026. However, the company still faces challenges in achieving meaningful expansion.
“Approximately $1 million of revenue expected in 2026 and meaningful expansion projected in 2027 and beyond.”
of Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. Item5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain O…
Other Events. Interlink Electronics, Inc. previously announced by press release on September 2, 2025 that it had executed a non-binding letter of intent for the acquisition of a privately held company in the United Kingdom. On December 3, 2025, the parties terminated the letter of intent with no liability to each other. 2 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned here…
of Current Report on Form 8-K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. On November 12, 2025, Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”) delivered written notice to Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC (“Lake Street”) to terminate, effective as of November 23, 2025, that certain At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2025, by and between the Company and Lake Street (the “Sales Agreement”). As previously reported, pursuant to the terms of the Sales Agreement, the Company could offer and sell shares…