Reading LNC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LNC free→Reading LNC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LNC free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - LifeSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality is fragile, meaning profits lack cash support. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 61% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples but has weak financials and fragile earnings quality. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $37.30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $37 LNC trades at 5× p/e, below its 13× p/e peer median. Our $68 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $37–$48. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 46% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -28%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.14x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $2.10 → $2.03 (-3.4% / 30d). 3 raised, 5 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 38% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 13.1% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$125.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$356.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,910.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth may be a challenge for Lincoln Financial.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median, signaling a slowdown.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth is still above its median. This shows ongoing expansion.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LNC yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Lincoln National Corporation (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s statistical supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, is attached as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information, including exhibits attached hereto, furnished und…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$37.00 – $48.00 (median $40.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Multi-line Insurance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LNC Lincoln Financial | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 28 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
AIG American International Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
L Loews Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | low |
AIZ Assurant | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AFG American Financial Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | fair | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on enhancing operating income through strategic initiatives and cost management.
Drive revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Continue to provide consistent dividend payouts to shareholders.
Why it matters: Higher revenue shows success in market expansion. This matches management's growth focus.
Confirms:Q2 revenue is over $5.31B. This shows strong market performance.
Disproves:Q2 revenue falls below $5.31B, suggesting challenges in growth.
Why it matters: A drop in income shows problems with making money. This can hurt future growth.
Confirms:Operating income is down compared to last quarter.
Disproves:Operating income is up compared to last quarter.
Executive Vice President, Head of Retail Life and Annuity Solutions — Brian Kroll: Brian Kroll is retiring with a planned succession in place.