Reading MAT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAT free→Reading MAT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track MAT free→
NASDAQConsumer DiscretionaryLeisureSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, while risk is moderate and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 17% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. The valuation reflects that MAT is priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $14.65. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $15 MAT trades at 12× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $17 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $18–$28. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 16% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.09x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated fragile grew net income 45% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.06 → $0.06 (-6.2% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$100.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$311.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,646.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Successful game launches may increase digital revenue. They can also prove the digital strategy.
Confirms:Users are very engaged. Revenue is high from the two self-published mobile games.
Disproves:Users are not engaged. Revenue is low from the two self-published mobile games.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for MAT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 29, 2026, Mattel, Inc. (“Mattel”) issued a press release regarding its first quarter 2026 financial results, a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto. This exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act o…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$18.00 – $28.00 (median $18.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-04-30
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Leisure Products.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
MAT Mattel | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 61 of 100 | fair | moderate |
HAS Hasbro | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | fair | moderate |
GOLF Acushnet Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BC Brunswick | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 11 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
THO Thor Industries | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | fair | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=483).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Mattel aims to drive revenue growth through increased sales and strategic investments.
Mattel is focused on improving cash flow from operations through strategic investments and cost management.
Mattel aims to improve operating income through cost management and strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth could impact Mattel's performance. It signals broader challenges.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: Stable margins show good cost management. This can help increase operating income.
Confirms:Gross margin stabilizes above 44% in Q2.
Disproves:Gross margin falls below 44% in Q2.
Why it matters: Better operating income is important for Mattel's profits. Any gain shows progress.
Confirms:Operating income improves from -$102.68M in Q1 to above -$50M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income worsens or remains below -$100M in Q2.
Why it matters: Faster sales growth shows strong consumer demand. It helps meet revenue growth goals.
Confirms:Q2 net sales growth exceeds 4% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 net sales growth remains at or below 4% year over year.
Why it matters: Positive cash flow is vital for Mattel's financial health. It shows better cash management.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported above $0 in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains negative in Q2.
The filing pertains to the amendment and restatement of a compensation plan.