Solv Energy Inc (MWH)
NASDAQUtilitiesRenewable UtilitiesSnapshot 2026-11-04
NASDAQUtilitiesRenewable UtilitiesSnapshot 2026-11-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · MWH
What must go right, what could break, what the price assumes, and what evidence comes next.
The current health of the standing investment case.
Recent financial performance is still in the top half of its industry but slipped notably this past month — worth watching.
One-year growth currently built into the price, compared with our model's estimate.
| Measure | Marker shape | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Growth built into the price | circle | 3.8% |
| Our one-year growth estimate | diamond | Not available |
For each item: what to watch, what would become a concern, and what would make it less concerning.
A reporting-risk estimate, not a forecast of the stock-price response.
Historical relationships that met the evidence threshold. They do not prove cause or forecast a move.
Usually moved in the same direction.
Price observations: 173 days
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Based on historical daily prices through 2026-11-04.
Past price behavior in dollars on a $10,000 position. This does not measure permanent business risk.
How much price usually moves either way.
Use the underlying financial and sector pages to investigate the cause.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Growth built into the price is above our model estimate.
A comparable growth gap is not available.
The one-year revenue growth assumption on Valuation.
Worth watching into the next print: this name has been missing across recent quarters and operates in a high-miss-rate industry. A fundamental tilt, not a price call.
Model as of 2026-11-04 · Compared with 0 industry peers
MWH — earnings miss
Dated 2026-05-12
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 12, 2026, SOLV Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information furnished with this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise…
Why it matters: Backlog rose to $8.9 billion in June, up 44% year over year. The next report can show whether new work keeps that growth going.
Supportive ifThe November 12 report shows backlog above $8.9 billion. Year-over-year backlog growth is above 0%.
Worry ifThe November 12 report shows backlog below $8.9 billion and down year over year.
Why it matters: First-half adjusted gross margin fell to 16.5% from 18.2%. The new full-year range is lower, so results will show if margin pressure continues.
Worry ifFull-year adjusted gross margin is below 16.0%, the bottom of the updated range.
Less concerning ifFull-year adjusted gross margin is at least 16.0% and within the updated 16.0% to 16.6% range.
Why it matters: Revenue grew 72% in the first half, and management raised its full-year range. A result at or above the range floor would confirm that pace held.
Supportive ifFull-year 2026 revenue is at least $3.87 billion, within or above the raised guidance range.
Worry ifFull-year 2026 revenue is below $3.87 billion, the bottom of the raised range.
Why it matters: First-half adjusted EBITDA rose to $210 million from $120 million. Management raised its full-year range, making the year-end result a clear test of earnings growth.
Supportive ifFull-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA is at least $485 million. This meets or tops the raised guidance range.
Worry ifFull-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA is below $485 million, the bottom of the raised range.
We watch for confirming and disproving signals on each item. Resolutions are found automatically where possible and checked by hand for unclear cases. Last 90 days shown.
A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
| Measure | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Typical day | ±$229 on $10,000 · ±2.3% | How much price usually moves either way. |
| Bad day | $629 loss on $10,000 · 6.3% | A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days. |
| Largest peak-to-trough drop in the past year | $5,429 loss on $10,000 · 54.3% | Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year. |
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement; 1.20 means about 20% more.
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement to the sector. This is secondary context.
Latest 30 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
Latest 252 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
20-trading-day average in US dollars.
Trading days used by the source risk snapshot.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.