Reading OGEN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OGEN free→Reading OGEN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OGEN free→
AMEXHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed as the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with OGEN compared to sector peers being below typical. If sector bellwethers like VRTX, REGN, and ARGX keep beating earnings and guiding higher, the Healthcare sector momentum should keep lifting OGEN and other Healthcare names. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $0.61. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $0.62 OGEN trades at 9× p/s, below its 9× p/s peer median. Our $0.65 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 3% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated weak grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=2391).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.01x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
10 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=842).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$298.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$809.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $8,847.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation changed. The valuation label moved from "fair" to "None." Risk remained high. The sector backdrop is a headwind. Earnings quality is loss-making. Recent performance is weak. Management is neutral.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
No named catalysts to watch right now. Check back after the next earnings report.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advancement in drug trial supports product development goals.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
OTHER INFORMATION. On March 10, 2026, Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing that it had received final Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval in Australia to commence the Company’s Phase IIa clinical trial evaluating the Company’s lead drug candidate, ONP-002, for the treatment of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). On March 11, 2026, the Company issued a press release announcing that the Company is exploring discussions with third parties r…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus peers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
OGEN ORAGENICS INC | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 0 of 100 | fair | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS. (e) Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Executive Officer Compensation . The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”), consistent with the previously disclosed compensation program, reviewed the base compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Janet Huffman, and on December 11, 2025, the Board au…
Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy A Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer of Listing. On October 20, 2025, Oragenics, Inc. (the “ Company ”) received a letter from the NYSE American informing the Company it has regained compliance with the stockholder’s equity requirements of the NYSE American continued listing standards. As such, it is expected that at the opening of trading on October 21, 2025, the below compliance (“.BC”) indicator will be removed and the Company will be rem…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On October 16, 2025, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “ Settlement Agreement ”) with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. (“ Ladenburg ”), pursuant to which the Company and Ladenburg agreed to settle all claims between the parties, including those arising under the Investment Banking Agreement between the parties dated December 7, 2022 (the “ IB Agreement ”). As previously reported, Ladenburg claimed it was due $2,500,000 in connection…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Effective September 1, 2025, the board of directors (the “ Board ”) of Oragenics, Inc. (the “ Company ”) appointed Ms. Natasha Giordano to the Company’s Board. Ms. Giordano, since July 2, 2025, has served as the Board Chair for Incora Health and, since August 2024, has served on the Compensation Committee and on the Board of Directors of Afaxys Inc…