Reading PEGA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PEGA free→Reading PEGA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PEGA free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while earnings quality is neutral and risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, PEGA is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 10% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment hinges on guidance changes, as a cut could negatively impact estimates, while a raise could boost momentum. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $32.76. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $33 PEGA trades at 19× p/e, below its 21× p/e peer median. Our $37 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $48–$65. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 11% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.51x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.43 → $0.43 (+0.0% / 30d). 3 raised, 6 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 2 guided quarters · 154.4% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$192.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$479.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,084.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A significant drop in revenue would signal ongoing challenges in growth and demand.
Confirms:Q2 2026 total revenue reported below $386 million, which is a 10% decline from Q2 2025.
Disproves:Q2 2026 total revenue remains stable or grows year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PEGA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and the Exhibits attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$48.00 – $65.00 (median $60.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-04-22
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Application Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PEGA Pegasystems | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | fair | elevated |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | full | elevated |
PLTR Palantir Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
SAP SAP SE | — | — | elevated |
APP AppLovin | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing Annual Contract Value (ACV) through Pega Cloud and AI initiatives.
Increase free cash flow through operational efficiency and strategic investments.
Improve operating margins through cost management and revenue growth.
Management aims to drive revenue growth as a key strategic priority.
Management is focused on enhancing operating income through cost management.
Why it matters: Better revenue growth shows that management is making progress. The company is bouncing back from recent drops.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds a 5% increase compared to Q1's $429.9M.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains flat or declines compared to Q1.
Why it matters: The earnings report will provide key updates on revenue, income, and cash flow. It is crucial for assessing progress.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows positive trends in revenue and income.
Confirms the other:The earnings report shows ongoing drops in important financial numbers.
Why it matters: Strong cash flow shows good health. It helps with future growth investments.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported above $200 million for Q2 2026.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations falls below $150 million in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: AI investment insights will show Pega's position and future growth.
Confirms one read:Management says AI investments made money in Q2 2026.
Confirms the other:Management talks about issues with AI investment results in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Higher operating income means better cost control. This shows the company is fixing its profit problems.
Confirms:Q2 operating income rose to over $50M. This is up from Q1's $37.1M.
Disproves:Operating income stays below $37.1M in Q2.
Why it matters: A rise in ACV shows strong demand for Pega's cloud solutions and growth potential.
Confirms:Pega Cloud ACV increases more than 15% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Pega Cloud ACV growth falls below 10% year over year in Q2 2026.