Outdoor Holding Co. (POWW)
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-09-04
$2.17+1.40%
Close 2026-09-04 · 1-day change
NASDAQIndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSnapshot 2026-09-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · POWW
Price, fair value, and the multiples that frame it on the same time axis. Scroll over the price chart to zoom.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $2.17 the market pays 5.0× p/s — above the 3.3× p/s peer median but in line with its own 5× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $1.43 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
Score 100 = cheapest in the cohort, 0 = richest. Bars are filled left-to-right based on the peer-relative score (or PEG/self-history where shown).
Each method's implied share price per horizon. Provisional rows use a projected (historical-CAGR) growth input rather than analyst or management guidance.
| Method | Horizon | Est. price | Multiple | Per-share input | EPS source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer EV/EBITDA | 12M | $5.74 | 27.0 | 0.19 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/FCF | 12M | $2.79 | 30.4 | 0.09 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/E | 12M | $0.30 | 30.3 | 0.01 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/S | 12M | $1.43 | 3.3 | 0.43 | TTM | high |
| triangulated | 12M |
A “consensus-then vs. actual-now” overlay is on the way — what our valuation estimate said on a past date versus where the price actually landed.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 25% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3, 2027-Q1
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
| $0.30 |
| 30.3 |
| 0.01 |
| Triangulated |
| high |
| Peer P/FCF | 3Y | $0.92 | 30.4 | 0.03 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/E | 3Y | $0.99 | 30.3 | 0.03 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/S | 3Y | $0.83 | 3.3 | 0.25 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/FCF | 5Y | $0.44 | 30.4 | 0.01 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/E | 5Y | $0.44 | 30.3 | 0.01 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/S | 5Y | $0.37 | 3.3 | 0.11 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |