Reading PRGS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PRGS free→Reading PRGS? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track PRGS free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySoftware - InfrastructureSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind, with PRGS trading above typical levels compared to its peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 72% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment hinges on guidance from PRGS, as a reversal and cut in guidance could significantly impact credibility and stock performance. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $31.47. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $31 PRGS trades at 6× p/e, below its 28× p/e peer median. Our $94 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 66% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 21%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.12x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.44 → $1.45 (+0.7% / 30d). 2 raised, 4 cut, 6 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 83% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 3 guided quarters · 145.8% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$215.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$513.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,114.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if company momentum continues to improve. Investors will look for signs of growth.
Confirms:Earnings per share (EPS) exceeds analyst expectations by more than 10%.
Disproves:EPS falls short of analyst expectations by more than 10%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for PRGS yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
No material events in the last 90 days.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Systems Software.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
PRGS Progress Software Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MSFT Microsoft | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | full | moderate |
PANW Palo Alto Networks | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CRWD CrowdStrike | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 29 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
NOW ServiceNow | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | elevated |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue through AI-powered digital experience and infrastructure software.
Continue to achieve high operating margins through efficient operations and cost management.
Focus on generating robust cash flow and strengthening the balance sheet.
Why it matters: Higher inflation could impact software budgets. This may affect Progress Software's growth outlook.
Confirms:Consumer Price Index (CPI) rises more than expected.
Disproves:CPI rises less than expected or falls.
Why it matters: The Consumer Price Index (CPI) affects market sentiment. High inflation could impact tech spending.
Confirms one read:CPI shows a decrease month over month, indicating easing inflation.
Confirms the other:CPI shows an increase month over month, indicating rising inflation.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in the IT sector. This may affect Progress Software's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth has been below its median for two months in a row.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median for the next two months.
Why it matters: More people filing for unemployment could mean the economy is weak. This might lower software spending.
Confirms:Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims increase from the previous week on either date.
Disproves:Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims fall or stay stable.