Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT)
NASDAQInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-11-04
NASDAQInformation TechnologyComputer HardwareSnapshot 2026-11-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · QUBT
What must go right, what could break, what the price assumes, and what evidence comes next.
The current health of the standing investment case.
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
One-year growth currently built into the price, compared with our model's estimate.
| Measure | Marker shape | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Growth built into the price | circle | 333.6% |
| Our one-year growth estimate | diamond | 100.0% |
For each item: what to watch, what would become a concern, and what would make it less concerning.
A reporting-risk estimate, not a forecast of the stock-price response.
Historical relationships that met the evidence threshold. They do not prove cause or forecast a move.
Usually moved in the same direction.
Price observations: 365 days
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Based on historical daily prices through 2026-11-04.
Past price behavior in dollars on a $10,000 position. This does not measure permanent business risk.
How much price usually moves either way.
Use the underlying financial and sector pages to investigate the cause.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Growth built into the price is above our model estimate.
The price assumes 233.6 percentage points more one-year growth.
The one-year revenue growth assumption on Valuation.
Model as of 2026-11-04 · Compared with 5 industry peers
QUBT — earnings in line
Dated 2026-08-10
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On August 10, 2026, Quantum Computing Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 (the “Section”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (…
Why it matters: Q2 revenue rose to $5.6 million, but much came from acquired businesses. The next report can show whether sales keep growing.
Watch forQ3 revenue exceeds $5.6 million, the Q2 level, and the report shows sales across more than one product line.
Also watch forQ3 revenue falls below $5.6 million, or the report ties most sales to acquired products.
Why it matters: The first installation is a commercial milestone. More paid systems or repeat orders would show demand beyond one customer.
Supportive ifQCi reports a second paid Dirac-3 sale or a repeat order from the consulting firm.
Worry ifQCi reports no further paid Dirac-3 sale or repeat order in its next two results releases.
Why it matters: The framework covers dozens of systems and over $10 million in possible program value. Payments depend on customer goals.
Watch forQCi says Planck met customer goals and deployed NeuraWave systems under the framework.
Also watch forQCi reports no customer milestones met, or says the Planck deployment has ended or been delayed.
Why it matters: Fab 2 adds room to make more products. That matters only if it supports production and sales. QCi also reported $21.8 million in Q2 operating costs.
Watch forQCi says Fab 2 is making customer orders. It also reports Fab 2 sales or output in a results release.
Also watch forQCi says Fab 2 production has slipped. Or its next two results releases report no Fab 2 output or customer sales.
We watch for confirming and disproving signals on each item. Resolutions are found automatically where possible and checked by hand for unclear cases. Last 90 days shown.
A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
| Measure | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Typical day | ±$276 on $10,000 · ±2.8% | How much price usually moves either way. |
| Bad day | $875 loss on $10,000 · 8.7% | A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days. |
| Largest peak-to-trough drop in the past year | $5,553 loss on $10,000 · 55.5% | Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year. |
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement; 1.20 means about 20% more.
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement to the sector. This is secondary context.
Latest 30 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
Latest 252 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
20-trading-day average in US dollars.
Trading days used by the source risk snapshot.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
Why it matters: Backlog rose from $16 million in Q1 to $42.5 million in Q2. A further rise would show more work under contract.
Watch forQ3 reported contract backlog is above $42.5 million.
Also watch forQ3 reported contract backlog is below $42.5 million.