Reading RGA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RGA free→Reading RGA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RGA free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - ReinsuranceSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and risk is low. However, the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to sector peers, where RGA trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 32% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $210.45. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $210 RGA trades at 9× p/e, below its 13× p/e peer median. Our $311 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $220–$268. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 32% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 23%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.16x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $6.50 → $6.53 (+0.5% / 30d). 4 raised, 3 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 60% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 24.1% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$104.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$213.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,306.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
risk label changed from 'moderate' to 'low'.
As of June 12, 2026, risk fell, with the risk label changing to low. The sector backdrop remains a headwind, indicating ongoing challenges in the environment. Recent financial performance is strong, while earnings quality is robust. The management dimension is neutral, suggesting stability in leadership.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it shows problems in making more money. This is an important goal for management.
Confirms:In Q2, adjusted operating income was less than $450 million.
Disproves:In Q2, adjusted operating income was more than $450 million.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RGA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the “Company”) issued (1) a press release (the “Earnings Release”) announcing its earnings for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026, and providing certain additional information, a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference and (2) a quarterly financial supplement for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$220.00 – $268.00 (median $264.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-18
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | low |
EWBC East West Bancorp | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
NLY Annaly Capital Management | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
CG Carlyle Group | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 9 of 100 | full | elevated |
UNM Unum | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 14 of 100 | full | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Focus on increasing net income through strategic initiatives and operational improvements.
Continue efforts to increase operating income through efficiency and growth strategies.
Maintain a focus on returning value to shareholders through increased dividends.
Why it matters: Growth in operating income shows good management and smart plans. This can help make more money.
Confirms:Operating income was over $441 million for Q2.
Disproves:Operating income was under $441 million for Q2.
Why it matters: An increase shows a promise to give value back to shareholders. It also helps with spending goals.
Confirms:They announced a quarterly dividend of more than $0.93.
Disproves:No increase in the quarterly dividend from the current $0.93.
Why it matters: Growth in net income shows better operations. This can improve overall financial health.
Confirms:Net income reported above $330 million for Q2.
Disproves:Net income reported below $330 million for Q2.
Why it matters: If it drops below this level, it shows less demand in the reinsurance market.
Confirms:Net premiums reported below $4,500 million.
Disproves:Net premiums remain above $4,500 million.
Regulation FD Disclosure. In connection with the Earnings Call, the Company has prepared a presentation, dated May 7, 2026 (the “Earnings Presentation”), a copy of which is furnished as Exhibit 99.3 and incorporated herein by reference. The Earnings Release announced that effective May 5, 2026, the board of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.93, payable June 2, 2026, to shareholders of record as of May 19, 2026. The information set forth in Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 of t…
The filing describes an amendment to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, not a management change.