Reading RNR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RNR free→Reading RNR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RNR free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - ReinsuranceSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality and management are neutral. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, RNR is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 58% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $300.88. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $301 RNR trades at 5× p/e, below its 13× p/e peer median. Our $711 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $309–$340. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 58% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 2%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.51x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $11.00 → $10.93 (-0.7% / 30d). 9 raised, 4 cut, 16 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 0 maintained. 22% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$97.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$217.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,327.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
The signal changed to mixed. Risk fell. The macro backdrop remains a headwind. Recent financial performance is weak.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better underwriting income means better risk management. This leads to more profit for RenaissanceRe.
Confirms:Q2 underwriting income is up. It is better than Q1's income of $588,758.
Disproves:Q2 underwriting income stays negative or drops more from Q1's level.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RNR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer — Robert Qutub and Matthew Neuber: Robert Qutub is retiring as CFO, succeeded by Matthew Neuber.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$309.00 – $340.00 (median $325.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-05-04
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Financials (broad).
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RNR RenaissanceRe | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
EWBC East West Bancorp | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | full | moderate |
NLY Annaly Capital Management | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | full | moderate |
CG Carlyle Group | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 9 of 100 | full | elevated |
UNM Unum | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 14 of 100 | full | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
RenaissanceRe aims to enhance profitability through strategic underwriting and cost management.
RenaissanceRe is committed to improving cash flow from operations to support growth and stability.
RenaissanceRe aims to maintain stable dividends to provide consistent returns to shareholders.
Why it matters: Net income growth shows that the company is making more money. This matches management's focus on being efficient.
Confirms:Q2 net income increases year over year by more than 20%.
Disproves:Q2 net income growth is less than 10% year over year.
Why it matters: Strong cash flow growth shows management's focus on improving operations. It can support future investments.
Confirms:Q2 cash flow from operations increases year over year by more than 50%.
Disproves:Q2 cash flow from operations growth is less than 30% year over year.
Why it matters: A lower ratio shows better claims management and can help profits.
Confirms:Net claims and claim expense ratio falls below 45.1% in Q2.
Disproves:Net claims and claim expense ratio rises above 52.5% in Q2.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows stronger operations and helps keep dividends stable.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations is up compared to last quarter.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations declines or remains flat.
Why it matters: Stable or rising dividends show the company is financially healthy. This can draw in investors.
Confirms:Dividend per share remains at $0.41 or increases in Q2.
Disproves:Dividend per share decreases from $0.41 in Q1.
Why it matters: Stable dividends show good financial health. This may attract investors looking for income.
Confirms one read:Management says there will be no changes to the dividend policy soon.
Confirms the other:Management announces a cut or stop to the dividend.
Why it matters: If revenue growth drops below its median, it may signal a slowdown in the financial sector. This could impact RenaissanceRe.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth drops below its median of 12%.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays above its median of 12%.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 28, 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026 and the availability of its corresponding financial supplement. Copies of the press release and the financial supplement are attached as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, to this Form 8-K. This Form 8-K and Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 hereto are each being furnished to the Securities and E…
The filing describes the approval of a new long-term incentive plan.