Reading SITM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SITM free→Reading SITM? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track SITM free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality cannot be assessed because the company is unprofitable. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 254% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $729.89. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $730, SITM's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 49× p/s (4.2× the 12× p/s peer median, and 2.1× even its own history). At a normal multiple the price implies ~254% near-term growth vs our ~14% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $206 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $500–$900. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 254% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 14%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted -4.26x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.18 → $1.96 (+66.7% / 30d). 2 raised, 1 cut, 9 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$304.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$652.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,059.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A slowdown in revenue growth may show less demand in the precision timing market.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 80% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth remains above 80% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for SITM yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Agreement. Completion of Convertible Senior Notes Offering On May 22, 2026, SiTime Corporation (the “ Company ”) completed its registered underwritten public offering (the “ Offering ”) of $1.35 billion aggregate principal amount of 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (the “ Notes ”), pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement (the “ Underwriting Agreement ”) with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC as representatives of the several underwriters (the “ U…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$500.00 – $900.00 (median $825.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-07
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Finalize the acquisition of Renesas' timing business to enhance product portfolio and market reach.
Raise capital through the issuance of Convertible Senior Notes to fund strategic initiatives.
Initiate a share buyback program to enhance shareholder value.
Why it matters: This acquisition is key for SiTime's growth. Its effects on revenue will show if the strategy is working.
Confirms:Revenue growth from the Renesas assets exceeds 10% in the next quarter.
Disproves:Revenue growth from the Renesas assets is less than 0% in the next quarter.
Why it matters: Going above this threshold would show strong performance and profit.
Confirms:Non-GAAP net income reported above $40 million for Q2.
Disproves:Non-GAAP net income reported below $40 million for Q2.
Why it matters: The buyback program aims to enhance shareholder value. Its effect on stock price will be telling.
Confirms:Stock price increases by more than 5% following the buyback announcement.
Disproves:Stock price declines by more than 5% following the buyback announcement.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information set forth under
below, which includes $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes sold pursuant to the full exercise of the Underwriters’ option to purchase additional Notes, solely to cover over-allotments. The Notes were offered and sold in a public offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act ”), pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “ SEC ”) on February 26, 2024, which automatically became e…
of this report, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The information and the accompanying exhibit shall not be incorporated by reference into filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") made by the Company, except as shall be expressly se…
Other Events. As previously disclosed, on February 4, 2026, SiTime Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Renesas Electronics America Inc., a California corporation (“Renesas”). Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, Renesas will and will cause certain of its affiliates to sell, transfer, assign and convey to the Company all of their right, title and interest in, to and under certain assets related…