Reading STEP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track STEP free→Reading STEP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track STEP free→
NASDAQFinancialsAsset ManagementSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but the capital stance is capital unfriendly, and risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and compared with sector peers, STEP is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 28% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $44.39. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $44 the market pays 21× p/e — above the 15× p/e peer median but in line with its own 21× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $33 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $55–$85. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 34% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.12x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.55 → $0.53 (-2.8% / 30d). 2 raised, 2 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 4 maintained. 88% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 29.5% above current price.
1 positive, 1 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$211.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$469.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,411.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The sector is easing, and a drop in revenue growth could signal bigger issues for StepStone.
Confirms:StepStone's revenue growth falls below the median of 12% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains at or above the median of 12% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for STEP yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities The information provided under
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$55.00 – $85.00 (median $60.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-21
Looks more expensive than peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Asset Management & Custody Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
STEP StepStone Group | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 20 of 100 | full | elevated |
BLK BlackRock | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 65 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BX Blackstone Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 23 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
BNY BNY Mellon | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 62 of 100 | expensive | low |
BK BNY Mellon | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to reach an EPS of $0.65 for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.
Focus on enhancing cash flow from operations to support financial stability.
Continue to pursue strategic acquisitions to enhance market position.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows strong financial health. It helps with growth and investment plans.
Confirms:Cash from operations is better than last quarter.
Disproves:Cash from operations declines or stays flat compared to the previous quarter.
Why it matters: High unemployment claims may show a weak economy. This could hurt StepStone's performance.
Confirms:Unemployment claims rise above 300,000 for two consecutive weeks.
Disproves:Unemployment claims stay below 250,000 for two consecutive weeks.
Why it matters: Achieving this EPS target shows strong financial performance and growth potential. It reflects management's priority for the year.
Confirms:Q1 EPS reported at or above $0.65.
Disproves:Q1 EPS reported below $0.65.
Why it matters: New acquisitions can enhance growth and market position. They are a key part of StepStone's growth strategy.
Confirms:A new acquisition is announced. This is part of a strategy.
Disproves:No new acquisitions announced within the next quarter.
Why it matters: Falling performance fees may mean weaker investment results. This can hurt overall revenue.
Confirms:Total performance fees are below $300 million.
Disproves:Total performance fees are above $300 million.
Other Events. On May 29, 2026, StepStone Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and StepStone Group LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), completed the third exchange (the “2026 Exchange”) as part of the previously announced transactions to acquire equity interests of StepStone Group Real Estate LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“SRE”), StepStone Group Real Assets LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“SRA”) and StepStone Group Private Debt AG, a private company…
as if fully set forth herein. The information included in, or furnished with, this report shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.