Reading TEX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TEX free→Reading TEX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TEX free→
NYSEIndustrialsFarm & Heavy Construction MachinerySnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and risk is elevated, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect TEX's performance compared to its typical standing against sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 42% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. This assessment hinges on the potential for guidance changes and sector trends, particularly if major players in the Industrials sector continue to perform well or start to miss expectations. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $63.80. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $64 TEX trades at 14× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $109 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Analysts: $81–$100. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 41% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 18%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Industrials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=4882).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.87x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Industrials names rated robust grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3333).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.28 → $1.26 (-2.0% / 30d). 1 raised, 10 cut, 12 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 62% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$194.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$418.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,829.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A backlog under $7 billion may show weaker orders and future sales.
Confirms:Backlog reported below $7 billion at the end of Q2.
Disproves:Backlog reported above $7 billion at the end of Q2.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TEX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K of Terex Corporation (“Terex”) are the prepared statements of Terex from its May 1, 2026, conference call providing certain first quarter financial results. In addition, a replay of the teleconference is available to the public at https://investors.terex.com.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$81.00 – $100.00 (median $83.50) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-05-11
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TEX Terex | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 40 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
CMI Cummins | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | full | moderate |
PCAR Paccar | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | fair | low |
WAB Wabtec | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 68 of 100 | full | low |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLI
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Terex aims to achieve a 5% revenue growth on a pro forma basis for 2026.
Terex is focused on enhancing operating income despite recent challenges.
Terex is committed to maintaining its dividend payments at $0.17 per share.
Why it matters: Stable dividends show good financial health. They also help build trust with investors.
Confirms:Dividend per share remains at $0.17 in Q2.
Disproves:Dividend per share is cut below $0.17 in Q2.
Why it matters: Better sector performance may help Terex grow. It shows a stronger industrial environment.
Confirms:Sector growth rate improves to above 5% in Q2.
Disproves:Sector growth rate declines further below -1% in Q2.
Why it matters: Sales growth below 5% would signal a slowdown, raising concerns about demand.
Confirms:Q2 sales growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 sales growth reported above 5% year over year.
Why it matters: These synergies help the company make more money. They also improve profit margins.
Confirms:They announced $28 million in synergies by the end of 2026.
Disproves:Failure to achieve $28 million in synergies by year-end 2026.
Why it matters: Strong revenue growth signals that management's focus is paying off. It shows demand for Terex's products.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 10% year over year, building on Q1's growth.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth is below 5% year over year, indicating a slowdown.
Why it matters: Improving operating income shows Terex is managing costs better. This is key for long-term health.
Confirms:Operating income improves to at least $20M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income is still negative or goes down more in Q2.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Terex Corporation (“Terex”) issued a press release on May 1, 2026, in which Terex provided certain first quarter 2026 financial results. A copy of this press release is included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.