Reading TMDX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TMDX free→Reading TMDX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TMDX free→
NASDAQHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong. Earnings quality is neutral. Management's recent track record has been steady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Compared with sector peers, TMDX is below typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 58% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. Rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If TMDX cuts guidance on the next call, that's a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $72.91. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $73 the market pays 38× p/e — above the 23× p/e peer median but in line with its own 53× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $49 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $75–$142. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 48% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 58%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=889): about 49% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 85% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.28x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.61 → $0.55 (-9.8% / 30d). 1 raised, 3 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 73% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 8.8% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 1 guided quarters · -36.2% avg surprise
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$223.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$578.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,876.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings results will show if revenue growth is improving after the recent miss.
Confirms one read:Q2 revenue growth is over 10% compared to last year. This shows strong recovery.
Confirms the other:Q2 revenue growth falls below 5% year over year, signaling ongoing struggles.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TMDX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 5, 2026, TransMedics Group, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the Company’s financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. The information in this Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$75.00 – $142.00 (median $124.00) · 7 analysts · as of 2026-05-26
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TMDX TransMedics Group, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 30 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Enhance profitability by increasing gross profit margins through cost management.
Increase cash flow from operations to support business growth and financial stability.
Why it matters: This will show if the company can keep its revenue growth on track. A drop below 10% could signal trouble.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth stays at or above 10% year over year.
Why it matters: A drop in sector growth could affect TMDX's performance and outlook.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below the median of 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays above 10%. This shows ongoing strength.
Why it matters: Negative cash flow would raise concerns about financial health. Investors will watch this closely.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported as negative in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations remains positive in Q2.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows the company is managing its finances well.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations goes up by 15% from last quarter.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations goes down or stays the same. This shows financial stress.
Why it matters: Better margins mean improved cost management. This is important for making more money.
Confirms:Gross profit margin improves to above 60% in the next quarter.
Disproves:Gross profit margin falls below 55%. This shows cost problems are getting worse.