Reading WGO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WGO free→Reading WGO? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WGO free→
NYSEConsumer DiscretionaryRecreational VehiclesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
WGO's recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, indicating that cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. However, risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to peers, where it is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 24% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $29.24. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $29 WGO trades at 15× p/e, below its 16× p/e peer median. Our $39 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 24% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -4%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated neutral grew net income 48% of the time over the next year (vs 64% for the rest of the cohort, n=3804).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.77x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated robust grew net income 65% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=2427).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.86 → $0.82 (-4.8% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 11 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 1 downgrade / 30d, 0 maintained. 43% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$179.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$417.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,452.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'inexpensive' to 'fair'.
As of June 12, 2026, the valuation changed, moving from inexpensive to fair. Risk remained elevated, indicating ongoing concerns. The sector backdrop was noted as a headwind, suggesting challenges in the market environment. Overall, these changes reflect a shift in how WGO is perceived in terms of value and risk.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better operating income means lower costs. This is key for making more money.
Confirms:Operating income improves by more than 10% in Q3 compared to last year.
Disproves:Operating income declines or stays flat in Q3 compared to last year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WGO yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Director — Emily R. Silver: Appointment of a new director to the Board.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Automobile Manufacturers.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 43 of 100 | fair | elevated |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 24 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
GM General Motors | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 70 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
F Ford Motor Company | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
RIVN Rivian Automotive Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 7 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Consumer Discretionary names rated stable grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=483).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLY
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Winnebago Industries aims to drive revenue growth through product innovation and market expansion.
Winnebago Industries is focused on enhancing operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Winnebago Industries is committed to maintaining regular dividend payments to shareholders.
Why it matters: Improving revenue growth would show that Winnebago is overcoming current challenges. This is key for long-term success.
Confirms:Q3 revenue growth exceeds 4% year over year.
Disproves:Q3 revenue growth remains below 4% year over year.
Why it matters: An increase would show a focus on giving value back to shareholders.
Confirms:Dividend per share reported at $0.36 or higher in Q3.
Disproves:Dividend per share remains at $0.35 or lower in Q3.
Why it matters: Stable dividends show good financial health. This helps keep investors confident.
Confirms:Dividend payments remain consistent or increase in the next quarter.
Disproves:Dividend payments are cut or suspended in the next quarter.