Reading YELP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track YELP free→Reading YELP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track YELP free→
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is also neutral, indicating some uncertainty in the company's financial health. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 42% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, quality intact. The outlook hinges on whether YELP cuts guidance on the next call, as this could lead to a meaningful negative impact. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $23.10. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $23 YELP trades at 6× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $40 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $24–$30. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 42% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 4%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 0 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=902).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.39x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 48% for the rest of the cohort, n=690).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.55 → $0.36 (-34.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 8 cut, 8 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 18% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 13.9% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$165.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$479.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $4,478.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Yelp needs to increase revenue growth. A low number indicates ongoing struggles.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported below 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for YELP yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Approval of Amendment and Restatement of Employee Stock Purchase Plan As described below under
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$24.00 – $30.00 (median $26.50) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-15
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Interactive Media & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
YELP Yelp, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
GOOG Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 90 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
META Meta Platforms | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
RDDT REDDIT, INC. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 54 of 100 | expensive | high |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 63% for the rest of the cohort, n=271).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives.
Improve operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Ensure stable cash flow from operations to support business activities.
Why it matters: Maintaining cash flow is crucial for Yelp's financial health. Stability is a positive sign.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations turns positive and stabilizes in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations continues to decline in Q2.
Why it matters: Yelp wants to improve operating income. This shows they are managing costs better.
Confirms:Operating income went up from last year in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income declines or stays flat year over year in Q2.
Why it matters: Yelp works in a tough industry. Improvement could mean a better chance for growth.
Confirms:The sector is doing better, moving above -0.1 in Q3.
Disproves:Sector performance worsens, moving below -0.2 in Q3.
Why it matters: The new CTO's plans may change Yelp's technology and products, affecting growth.
Confirms one read:Good news about new technology or product updates from the new CTO.
Confirms the other:Bad feedback or delays in tech projects after the CTO change.
and the exhibits attached hereto are furnished to, but not “filed” with, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Chief Technology Officer — Sam Eaton: Sam Eaton is stepping down as Chief Technology Officer with a successor named.