Reading ZD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZD free→Reading ZD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZD free→
NASDAQCommunication ServicesAdvertising AgenciesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future growth. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact, as it is priced roughly in line with peers, with steady recent financials and earnings quality. Key factors to watch include the potential for a favorable shift if the Fed starts cutting rates and the performance of sector bellwethers like OMC, TTD, and MGNI. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $46.26. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $46 ZD trades at 8× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $59 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $40–$61. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 21% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 5%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated strong grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=701).
Over the trailing year it converted 9.18x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated robust grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=525).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.10 → $0.83 (-24.9% / 30d). 1 raised, 2 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 50% of analysts rate Buy.
Divergence: fundamentals are strong but estimates are being cut. Worth reading the recent material events.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$159.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$489.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,379.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better revenue would show recovery from the recent drop in Q1.
Confirms:Q2 revenues exceed $267.6 million, showing growth from Q1.
Disproves:Q2 revenues fell below $267.6 million. This shows a continued drop.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ZD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release (the “Press Release”) announcing its preliminary unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the Press Release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$40.00 – $61.00 (median $48.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-05-12
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Advertising.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ZD Ziff Davis | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 38 of 100 | fair | elevated |
OMC Omnicom Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TTD Trade Desk (The) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MGNI Magnite, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | high |
STGW Stagwell, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 47 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not enough signal yet.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Complete the divestiture of the Connectivity business to unlock shareholder value.
Focus on improving cash flow from operations to strengthen financial stability.
Continue efforts to improve operational efficiency across the organization.
Why it matters: Better cash flow shows improved financial health and performance.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations exceeds $30 million in Q2.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations falls below $30 million in Q2.
Why it matters: A better margin means the company is more efficient and controls costs well.
Confirms:Adjusted EBITDA margin is over 23.7% in Q2.
Disproves:Adjusted EBITDA margin falls below 23.7% in Q2.