ChargePoint Holdings Inc (CHPT)
NYSEConsumer DiscretionarySpecialty RetailSnapshot 2026-11-04
$10.96-3.94%
Close 2026-11-05 · 1-day change
NYSEConsumer DiscretionarySpecialty RetailSnapshot 2026-11-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · CHPT
What must go right, what could break, what the price assumes, and what evidence comes next.
The current health of the standing investment case.
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
One-year growth currently built into the price, compared with our model's estimate.
| Measure | Marker shape | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Growth built into the price | circle | 71.8% |
| Our one-year growth estimate | diamond | 13.1% |
For each item: what to watch, what would become a concern, and what would make it less concerning.
A reporting-risk estimate, not a forecast of the stock-price response.
Historical relationships that met the evidence threshold. They do not prove cause or forecast a move.
Usually moved in the same direction.
Price observations: 365 days
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Based on historical daily prices through 2026-11-04.
Past price behavior in dollars on a $10,000 position. This does not measure permanent business risk.
How much price usually moves either way.
Use the underlying financial and sector pages to investigate the cause.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Growth built into the price is above our model estimate.
The price assumes 58.7 percentage points more one-year growth.
The one-year revenue growth assumption on Valuation.
Model as of 2026-11-04 · Compared with 11 industry peers
CHPT — litigation filed
Dated 2026-09-30
Other Events. On September 28, 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “ChargePoint”), entered into a Settlement Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) to settle the securities class action pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”), captioned Farooq Khan v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al., No. 5:23-cv-06172-NW (the “Securities Class Action” and the proposed settlement, the “Proposed Securities Settlement”). The Company entered into t…
Why it matters: ChargePoint signed a settlement term sheet for a securities class action. Court approval or a failed deal will clarify the case.
Watch forThe court approves the proposed settlement in Farooq Khan v. ChargePoint Holdings, No. 5:23-cv-06172-NW.
Also watch forThe court rejects the settlement, or the parties report that the proposed settlement has ended.
Why it matters: The planned ports could add charging sites at multifamily homes. Public updates on completed ports can show whether the project is moving forward.
Supportive ifChargePoint or OBE Power says work has begun and lists completed ports toward the planned 2,500.
Worry ifA company update says the rollout is late, smaller, or canceled.
Why it matters: Q2 non-GAAP gross margin reached 38%, but tariff refunds added 4 points. A margin near 38% without that help would show stronger underlying results.
Supportive ifThe Q3 report shows non-GAAP gross margin at 38% or higher, with no similar tariff refund boost.
Worry ifQ3 non-GAAP gross margin falls below 34%, or the report says tariff refunds again added 4 points or more.
Why it matters: Revenue grew 18% in Q2 and beat the high end of guidance. A Q3 result above guidance would show that growth is continuing.
Supportive ifOn the December 3 report, Q3 revenue is above the $105 million to $115 million guidance range.
Worry ifQ3 revenue is below $105 million, the low end of guidance.
A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
| Measure | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Typical day | ±$341 on $10,000 · ±3.4% | How much price usually moves either way. |
| Bad day | $753 loss on $10,000 · 7.5% | A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days. |
| Largest peak-to-trough drop in the past year | $5,676 loss on $10,000 · 56.8% | Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year. |
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement; 1.20 means about 20% more.
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement to the sector. This is secondary context.
Latest 30 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
Latest 252 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
20-trading-day average in US dollars.
Trading days used by the source risk snapshot.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
Why it matters: The adjusted EBITDA loss fell to $4.8 million in Q2 from $22.1 million a year earlier. Keeping it below $5 million would extend that improvement.
Supportive ifThe Q3 report shows a non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA loss below $5 million.
Worry ifThe Q3 report shows a non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA loss above $10 million.