Reading CLF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CLF free→Reading CLF? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track CLF free→
NYSEMaterialsSteelSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with CLF trading below typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 69% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, particularly the performance of sector bellwethers. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 1 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $13.78. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $14 CLF trades at 0× p/s, below its 1× p/s peer median. Our $43 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $9.00–$15. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 68% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Materials names rated weak grew net income 51% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=1088).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.35x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.20 → $-0.20 (+1.8% / 30d). 0 raised, 2 cut, 5 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 2 maintained. 15% of analysts rate Buy.
3 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 0.5% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$285.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$560.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,167.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Company momentum fell by 29.5 points (from 29.1 to -0.4).
As of June 12, 2026, company momentum fell. The risk dimension also remains high. The sector backdrop is characterized as a headwind. The earnings quality is noted as loss-making, indicating ongoing financial challenges.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better operating income means better cost control. It also shows more efficiency.
Confirms:Operating income reported in Q2 is higher than in Q1.
Disproves:Operating income reported in Q2 is lower than in Q1.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for CLF yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 20, 2026, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. issued a news release announcing the first-quarter financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information contained in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the exhibit attached hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchan…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$9.00 – $15.01 (median $12.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-06-09
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2024-Q2, 2024-Q3, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Steel.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
NUE Nucor | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | fair | moderate |
STLD Steel Dynamics | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 58 of 100 | full | moderate |
RS Reliance, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
CMC Commercial Metals | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | fair | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLB
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
The company aims to maintain its capital expenditures at approximately $700 million for the fiscal year 2026.
The company plans to maintain steel shipment volumes between 16.5 and 17.0 million net tons for the fiscal year 2026.
The company aims to improve its cash flow from operations, which has been negative in recent quarters.
Focus on improving operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Drive revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Why it matters: Higher cash flow means better financial health. It shows the ability to fund operations.
Confirms:Cash flow from operations reported in Q2 is higher than in Q1.
Disproves:Cash flow from operations reported in Q2 is lower than in Q1.
Why it matters: Hitting this shipment target shows strong demand. It also shows stability in a tough market.
Confirms:Steel shipment volumes reported in Q2 fall between 16.5 and 17.0 million net tons.
Disproves:Steel shipment volumes reported in Q2 fall below 16.5 million net tons.
Why it matters: Higher revenue growth shows that plans are working.
Confirms:Q2 revenue is over $4.922B. This shows strong demand and good strategies.
Disproves:Q2 revenue falls below $4.629B, showing a decline in sales.