Reading DEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DEA free→Reading DEA? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DEA free→
NYSEReal EstateReit - OfficeSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact performance compared to sector peers, where DEA is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 39% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $24.04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $24 DEA trades at 3× p/s, below its 6× p/s peer median. Our $17 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 39% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1968).
Over the trailing year it converted 23.34x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated robust grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=1399).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market and real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.06. 0 raised, 0 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 29% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$76.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$217.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,123.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results give clues about the company's financial health. They show how well the company is doing.
Confirms one read:Earnings are over 5% higher than what analysts expected.
Confirms the other:Earnings fall short of analyst expectations by more than 5%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DEA yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
as well as the attached Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, including for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. We will h…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Office REITs.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DEA Easterly Government Properties, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
BXP BXP, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | full | moderate |
ARE Alexandria Real Estate Equities | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 44 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
VNO Vornado Realty Trust | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
HPP Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 59 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Real Estate names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
The company aims to increase its Core FFO guidance for the year 2026.
The company is committed to maintaining its dividend per share.
The company aims to enhance its cash from operating activities.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims may show economic weakness. This could lower demand for properties.
Confirms:Unemployment claims are much higher than last week.
Disproves:Unemployment claims go down or stay the same.
Why it matters: An increase in Core FFO guidance would signal stronger growth expectations for the company.
Confirms:Management raises Core FFO guidance for 2026 by more than 5%.
Disproves:Core FFO guidance remains unchanged or is lowered.
Why it matters: Changes in interest rates can change real estate costs. This affects property demand.
Confirms one read:The FOMC raises interest rates. This shows tighter monetary policy.
Confirms the other:The FOMC keeps rates steady or lowers them. This shows a more relaxed approach.
Why it matters: More cash from operations shows better money management. It also shows growth potential.
Confirms:Cash from operating activities grows by over 10% each year.
Disproves:Cash from operating activities goes down or stays the same.
Why it matters: Keeping the dividend shows good financial health. It also shows care for shareholders.
Confirms:The company announces a dividend per share that meets or exceeds the current level.
Disproves:The company cuts the dividend per share.
The excerpt is incomplete and does not provide sufficient details to determine the specific movement kind or individuals involved.