Reading JLL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JLL free→Reading JLL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JLL free→
NYSEReal EstateReal Estate ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but earnings quality is fragile, indicating that reported profits may not be well-supported by cash flow. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind, while JLL trades above typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 22% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. Key factors to watch include potential guidance cuts and sector trends, as these could significantly impact JLL's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $299.95. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $300 JLL trades at 15× p/e, below its 20× p/e peer median. Our $390 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $348–$425. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 23% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 8%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Real Estate names rated strong grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=1506).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.35x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Real Estate names rated fragile grew net income 35% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=1399).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to real (inflation-adjusted) rates, the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $4.55 → $4.53 (-0.3% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 10 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$119.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$281.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,189.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings guidance shows how JLL is doing. It also gives a view of future challenges.
Confirms one read:Earnings release shows revenue growth or positive guidance for the upcoming quarters.
Confirms the other:Earnings release shows falling revenue or bad guidance.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for JLL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
by reference. The information contained in this Current Report, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), nor incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$348.00 – $425.00 (median $366.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-13
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Real Estate Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CBRE CBRE Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 97 of 100 | fair | moderate |
CSGP CoStar Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
COMP Compass, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 39 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
OPEN Opendoor Technologies Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 12 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLRE
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Met or beat guidance 100% of the last 1 guided quarters · 3.0% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on disciplined strategy execution and capital allocation to enhance shareholder value.
Aim to achieve record earnings per share through strategic initiatives.
Commit to delivering strong long-term financial results through strategic initiatives.
Why it matters: If revenue growth picks up, it signals a potential recovery in the real estate sector.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported above 7% year over year.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth reported below 7% year over year.
Why it matters: Changes in unemployment claims can affect demand for real estate services. They also show market health.
Confirms one read:Weekly unemployment claims fall below 200,000. This shows a stronger job market.
Confirms the other:Weekly unemployment claims are over 300,000. This suggests the economy may be weak.
Why it matters: Achieving record EPS would show strong financial performance and support growth goals.
Confirms:Q2 EPS reported above the previous record of $X.
Disproves:Q2 EPS reported below the previous record of $X.