Open Lending Corp. (LPRO)
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Credit ServicesSnapshot 2026-11-05
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Credit ServicesSnapshot 2026-11-05
QuarterlyIQ Insights · LPRO
What must go right, what could break, what the price assumes, and what evidence comes next.
The current health of the standing investment case.
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
One-year growth currently built into the price, compared with our model's estimate.
| Measure | Marker shape | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Growth built into the price | circle | 91.3% |
| Our one-year growth estimate | diamond | 18.9% |
For each item: what to watch, what would become a concern, and what would make it less concerning.
A reporting-risk estimate, not a forecast of the stock-price response.
Historical relationships that met the evidence threshold. They do not prove cause or forecast a move.
Usually moved in the same direction.
Price observations: 365 days
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Based on historical daily prices through 2026-11-05.
Past price behavior in dollars on a $10,000 position. This does not measure permanent business risk.
How much price usually moves either way.
A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days.
Use the underlying financial and sector pages to investigate the cause.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Growth built into the price is above our model estimate.
The price assumes 72.4 percentage points more one-year growth.
The one-year revenue growth assumption on Valuation.
Worth watching into the next print: this name is on a run of consecutive earnings misses and is a smaller-cap name (higher miss base rate). A fundamental tilt, not a price call.
Model as of 2026-11-05 · Compared with 27 industry peers · Company calendar date is not available
LPRO — officer appointment
Dated 2026-07-31
Director — Jessica Buss, Abhijit Chaudhary, Eric A. Feldstein, Thomas K. Hegge, Blair J. Greenberg, Todd C. Hart: Multiple directors ceased serving in connection with a Merger.
Why it matters: Q1 loans fell year over year. The Q2 range tests whether loan volume is moving toward the full-year goal.
Watch forQ2 certified loans reach at least 22,000, within or above the 22,000 to 25,000 range.
Also watch forQ2 certified loans fall below 22,000.
Why it matters: Cash from operations has shifted between gains and losses several times. A gain would show stronger cash flow. Another loss would extend the uneven trend.
Watch forA reported quarter shows cash from operations above $0.
Also watch forA reported quarter shows cash from operations below $0.
We watch for confirming and disproving signals on each item. Resolutions are found automatically where possible and checked by hand for unclear cases. Last 90 days shown.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
| Measure | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Typical day | ±$64 on $10,000 · ±0.6% | How much price usually moves either way. |
| Bad day | $608 loss on $10,000 · 6.1% | A larger daily loss that occurred about once in every 20 trading days. |
| Largest peak-to-trough drop in the past year | $4,545 loss on $10,000 · 45.5% | Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year. |
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement; 1.20 means about 20% more.
Past year. 1.00 means similar movement to the sector. This is secondary context.
Latest 30 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
Latest 252 trading days, shown as an annual percentage.
20-trading-day average in US dollars.
Trading days used by the source risk snapshot.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.