Reading TBBK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TBBK free→Reading TBBK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TBBK free→
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and risk is elevated, while earnings quality is robust, indicating strong cash flow backing reported profits. The sector backdrop is a headwind, which may affect TBBK's performance compared to its peers, where it trades above typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 9% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. Key factors to watch include any potential guidance cuts from TBBK and the performance of sector bellwethers like HDB, IBN, and PNC. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $57.46. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $57 TBBK trades at 11× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $63 fair value sits above the price; medium confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 9% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 9%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.65x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
Not enough signal yet.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.35 → $1.36 (+1.0% / 30d). 2 raised, 1 cut, 3 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$121.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$416.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,592.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth below its median could signal a sector-wide headwind affecting The Bancorp.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported below the median of 13% in the next quarterly report.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above the median of 13%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TBBK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 23, 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release regarding its earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release is furnished with this report as Exhibit 99.1.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Regional Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TBBK The Bancorp, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | fair | elevated |
HDB HDFC BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
IBN ICICI BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
ITUB ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA | — | — | moderate |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 2 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
The company aims to reach a $7 earnings per share run-rate by the fourth quarter of 2026.
Not yet measured, building a track record across disclosures.
The company aims to maintain its EPS guidance for 2027 at $8.25.
The company aims to achieve an EPS of $5.10 for the fiscal year 2025.
Why it matters: Achieving a $7 EPS run-rate by Q4 2026 is a key goal for growth. Progress signals stronger performance.
Confirms:Q2 EPS report shows a run-rate of $1.75 or higher.
Disproves:Q2 EPS report shows a run-rate below $1.50.
Why it matters: High unemployment claims can show that the economy is weak. This affects banks.
Confirms:Weekly claims are over 300,000. This means unemployment is rising.
Disproves:Weekly claims stay below 250,000, suggesting a stable job market.
Why it matters: Maintaining the $8.25 EPS guidance is crucial for investor confidence and growth outlook.
Confirms:Management confirms the $8.25 EPS guidance in the next earnings call.
Disproves:Management lowers the EPS guidance to below $8.00.