Expectations trend
Comparable estimate history is unavailable.
Revenue and EPS estimates track expectations. They are not delivered results or like-for-like proof of a required annual path.
Compare required revenue and earningsNASDAQIndustrialsConglomeratesSnapshot 2026-11-04
The long-term thesis, the evidence coming in, and the environment around it. Thesis dated Jul 8, 2026.
Next-FY EPS estimate change · 30 days
Matching fiscal periods, usable estimates and at least one analyst are required.
One observable signal. This measures changing earnings expectations, not the probability of a gain or loss.
The calculation requires same-period, same-provider snapshots, positive EPS, at least one analyst and a baseline within three days of the requested lookback.
The EPS and P/E reference is not available for TUSK yet.
| Measure / period | Management expectations | Analyst expectations |
|---|
Management figures unavailable.
Current consensus figures unavailable.
Three published thesis conditions, with dated milestones shown separately.
| Key Factor | Why It Matters | Current Status | Break Condition | Latest Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Achieve full-year Adjusted EBITDA positive in 2026 | The company aims to be Adjusted EBITDA positive in 2026. | Improving | Adjusted EBITDA remains negative for full year 2026 | Direct metric needs a verified mapping The published measure or accounting basis is not supported by an exact source binding. Date unavailableLast status assessment Nov 4, 2026Compare required operating outcomesCompare scope, accounting basis and period before treating this evidence as progress against an annual requirement. Management contextStated in 1 of 2 supplied quarters. Management reported: “Mark Layton, Chief Financial Officer of Mammoth commented, “We are increasing our full-year 2026 outlook for the second time this year based on continued improvement across our operating businesses and the growing contribution from our aviation platform.” “Based on the progress we're seeing, we are raising our 2026 outlook, including now expecting to reach full-year Adjusted EBITDA positive in 2026.” |
Compare these dated observations with the operating requirements above
Comparable estimate history is unavailable.
Revenue and EPS estimates track expectations. They are not delivered results or like-for-like proof of a required annual path.
Compare required revenue and earningsMonthly analyst history is unavailable.
Recent actions · Oct 6–Nov 4 · 0 recorded
The evidence, the remaining questions, and what comes next
No recovery evidence is reported in the available driver assessments.
Next earnings date unavailable
Look for updated results and guidance against the published targets, plus direct evidence for unresolved drivers.
Observed price history; separate from operating scenarios
The weekly editorial context below is a separate assessment from the dated monitor evidence above. Recovery observations do not automatically change the published thesis. Unverified outside influences are hypotheses, not measured driver evidence.
This is a high-risk growth and execution story, not yet a proven durable compounder: the company is loss-making, and reported operating income has been inconsistent. The long-term thesis is on watch, though its signal recently shifted from mixed to mildly favorable.
Valuation is expensive versus peers, with a substantial expectations gap and a low-confidence estimate that re-rating is the main driver of valuation divergence. The evidence labels the priced-in setup unjustified, but fragility is low because it does not combine expensive valuation with weak and turbulent conditions.
Near term, recent execution is mixed: third-quarter revenue grew sharply year over year and adjusted EBITDA rose, but revenue fell from the prior quarter and operating income turned negative again. Management has expanded the aviation platform and expects strong full-year revenue growth, while smaller-company scale and erratic earnings surprises remain risks.
Over the next few quarters, the thesis depends on continued revenue growth, more revenue-producing aviation assets, and whether adjusted EBITDA progress becomes consistent operating income. A cut to guidance after the recent raise would damage management credibility, while results and guidance from industrial bellwethers could either sustain or weaken the sector backdrop.
For the 1-to-3-year view, TUSK shows real progress in aviation growth and adjusted EBITDA, but inconsistent operating income, high risk, and expensive valuation leave execution as the central test. Not investment advice.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Maintain stable and effective management | A supporting condition in Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s published investment case. The stated target is No major management disruptions or auditor changes. | Under Pressure | Further major management changes or regulatory issues occur | Auditor change occurred (Deloitte dismissed May 2026) Item 4.01 filing confirms dismissal of Deloitte & Touche LLP on May 13, 2026. Nov 4, 2026Last status assessment Nov 4, 2026Compare required operating outcomesCompare scope, accounting basis and period before treating this evidence as progress against an annual requirement. |
Sustain revenue growth above -15% next year | A primary condition in Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.'s published investment case. The stated target is >=-15% YoY revenue growth. | Improving | YoY revenue growth falls below -15% in FY26 | Revenue growth: 44.22% FY2026-Q3; GAAP. Published target: >=-15% YoY revenue growth. Annual target cannot be compared with a quarterly or TTM observation. Oct 30, 202644.219985 percent · calculatedLast status assessment Nov 4, 2026Compare required operating outcomesCompare scope, accounting basis and period before treating this evidence as progress against an annual requirement. |
Stored thesis · Jul 8, 2026. Latest Evidence uses source-matched measurements where available, alongside the last thesis-monitor assessment. Source periods and assessment dates are shown separately. A new measurement does not automatically change the published status or verify an older target.
Individual price-target observations are unavailable.
0 raises · 0 cuts · 0 unchanged · 0 without a comparable prior
Oct 6, 2026–Nov 4, 2026. Each firm's latest positive target is paired only with its immediately prior positive target from the same provider, at most 180 days earlier. Unmatched observations have one dot; conflicting observations are not compared.
3 of 3 published conditions remain under pressure or need verification. The next results need to address those conditions.
The dated weekly assessment and its assumptions are available in Read detailed Outlook.