Ventas (VTR)
NYSEReal EstateReit - Healthcare FacilitiesSnapshot 2026-09-04
$90.27-2.00%
Close 2026-09-04 · 1-day change
NYSEReal EstateReit - Healthcare FacilitiesSnapshot 2026-09-04
QuarterlyIQ Insights · VTR
Price, fair value, and the multiples that frame it on the same time axis. Scroll over the price chart to zoom.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $90 VTR trades at 26× p/ffo — 2.0× the 13× p/ffo peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $58 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts target $88–$110. Note: our $58 fair value sits below the entire analyst range ($88–$110). Even valued only for durable growth at sustainable margins, it's worth about $146 — above today's price, so the premium reflects that growth case, not pure multiple expansion. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
Score 100 = cheapest in the cohort, 0 = richest. Bars are filled left-to-right based on the peer-relative score (or PEG/self-history where shown).
Each method's implied share price per horizon. Provisional rows use a projected (historical-CAGR) growth input rather than analyst or management guidance.
| Method | Horizon | Est. price | Multiple | Per-share input | EPS source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyst target | 12M | $100.00 | — | — | Analyst | high |
| graham number | 12M | $29.62 | — | — | TTM | high |
| Peer P/FFO | 12M | $45.73 | 13.2 | 3.47 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/S | 12M | $49.56 | 3.8 | 12.94 | TTM | high |
| residual income |
A “consensus-then vs. actual-now” overlay is on the way — what our valuation estimate said on a past date versus where the price actually landed.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Around the middle on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
$88.00 – $110.00 (median $100.00) · 13 analysts · as of 2026-09-01
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
| 12M |
| $24.91 |
| — |
| — |
| TTM |
| high |
| triangulated | 12M | $18.97 | 13.2 | 1.44 | Triangulated | high |
| Peer P/FFO | 3Y | $61.60 | 13.2 | 4.67 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/S | 3Y | $74.07 | 3.8 | 19.34 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/FFO | 5Y | $75.13 | 13.2 | 5.69 | Hist. CAGR(prov.) | medium |
| Peer P/S | 5Y | $96.20 | 3.8 | 25.12 | Analyst | medium |