Reading WRLD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WRLD free→Reading WRLD? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track WRLD free→
NASDAQFinancialsCredit ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-12
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits, while risk is elevated and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 52% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is rich, as it trades above peer multiples, and the longer horizon does not make that back through growth. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, as both could significantly impact WRLD's outlook. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $178.45. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $178 WRLD trades at 24× p/e — 2.2× the 11× p/e peer median, and above its own 15× history. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $113 fair value is low-confidence here. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 58% of near-term growth above a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Flags: expensive valuation, a turbulent sector regime (Heating).
For similar setups historically (n=2,301): about 43% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 77% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 7.50x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.44 → $0.58 (+31.8% / 30d). 0 raised, 1 cut, 1 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 0% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$166.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$488.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,734.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-12
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: This report will give details about the company's finances and future plans.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings show revenue growth above the sector median of 12%.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings report shows revenue growth below the sector median.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for WRLD yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On June 3, 2026, World Acceptance Corporation (the “Company”) and Janet L. Matricciani agreed that Ms. Matricciani’s role as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer would terminate effective June 3, 2026. The termination is not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or prac…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Consumer Finance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
WRLD World Acceptance Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
AXP American Express | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
COF Capital One | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 37 of 100 | fair | moderate |
SYF Synchrony Financial | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 75 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AFRM Affirm Holdings Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 3 of 100 | expensive | high |
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-12.
Focus on portfolio growth with a lower proportion of new customers to improve credit quality.
Ensure compliance with fixed charge coverage ratio covenants to manage financial stability.
Focus on improving overall portfolio credit quality by tightening underwriting standards.
Why it matters: Higher net charge-offs may show worse credit quality. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:Net charge-offs exceed $48 million in the next quarter.
Disproves:Net charge-offs remain below or equal to $48 million.
Why it matters: If G&A expenses go over 50%, it may show inefficiencies. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:G&A expenses as a percentage of revenues exceed 50%.
Disproves:G&A expenses as a percentage of revenues remain at or below 50%.
Why it matters: A low fixed charge coverage ratio may show liquidity problems. This can raise borrowing costs.
Confirms:Fixed charge coverage ratio stays below 1.5.
Disproves:Fixed charge coverage ratio goes above 1.5.
Why it matters: A decrease in new customer growth signals a shift in strategy to focus on existing customers. This could improve overall portfolio health.
Confirms:New customers as a percentage of the portfolio falls below 8%.
Disproves:New customers as a percentage of the portfolio remains above 8%.
Why it matters: The new CEO's plan will shape the company's direction after the leadership change.
Confirms one read:A press release talks about the new CEO's plans and goals for the company.
Confirms the other:No announcement or vague statements about future plans from the new CEO.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Consent and Limited Modification to Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Covenant On May 22, 2026, World Acceptance Corporation (the "Company") entered into a Consent and Limited Modification to Fixed Charge Ratio (the "Modification") with Bank of Montreal ("BMO"), as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and the Required Lenders party to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 22, 2025 (as amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Cr…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition; and
President and Chief Executive Officer — R. Chad Prashad: Resigned to pursue other opportunities.