Skillz Inc (SKLZ)
NYSECommunication ServicesElectronic Gaming & MultimediaSnapshot 2026-09-04
NYSECommunication ServicesElectronic Gaming & MultimediaSnapshot 2026-09-04
Research Workspace
Put SKLZ beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Primary pillar broken — Net loss reduction toward breakeven: metric not reported.
View ThesisRevenue growth is accelerating — up about 31% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens weak on capital allocation, margins.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 4% on a typical day and fell roughly 75% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskSKLZ's growth depends on improving financial performance and reducing net losses. Recent results show a significant miss of 19% in the last quarter. The company trades at a valuation below typical for its sector peers. This suggests that expectations may not fully reflect the current challenges. A specific risk is the 54% probability of missing estimates again next quarter. Peer multiples imply a price about 0% below where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-06-18. SKLZ is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 1 analyst currently covering SKLZ (as of Jun 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare SKLZ with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKLZ Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Interactive Home Entertainment — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put SKLZ next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Improve financial performance
Discusses financial struggles despite potential windfall.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-06-18. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Advances: Improve financial performance
Highlights revenue growth and strategic shifts positively.